Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice

被引:222
作者
Kim, Minchi C. [1 ]
Hannafin, Michael J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, Dept Educ Psychol & Instruct Technol, Learning & Performance Support Lab, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
Scaffolding; Scaffolds; Technology-enhanced classrooms; Problem solving; Scientific inquiry; Technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs); Technology integration; PROJECT-BASED SCIENCE; KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION; ATHEORETICAL NATURE; TEACHER BELIEFS; INQUIRY; FRAMEWORK; SUPPORT; SCHOOL; ARGUMENTATION; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.024
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
With the expanding availability and capability of varied technologies, classroom-based problem solving has become an increasingly attainable, yet still elusive, goal. Evidence of technology-enhanced problem-solving teaching and learning in schools has been scarce, understanding how to support students' problem solving in classroom-based, technology-enhanced learning environments has been limited, and coherent frameworks to guide implementation have been slow to emerge. Whereas researchers have examined the use and impact of scaffolds in mathematics, science, and reading, comparatively little research has focused on scaffolding learning in real-world, everyday classroom settings. Web-based systems have been developed to support problem solving, but implementations suggest variable enactment and inconsistent impact. The purpose of this article is to identify critical issues in scaffolding students' technology-enhanced problem solving in everyday classrooms. First, we examine two key constructs (problem solving and scaffolding) and propose a framework that includes essential dimensions to be considered when teachers scaffold student problem solving in technology-rich classes. We then investigate issues related to peer-, teacher-, and technology-enhanced scaffolds, and conclude by examining implications for research. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 417
页数:15
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]   An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor [J].
Aleven, VAWMM ;
Koedinger, KR .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) :147-179
[2]   INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
BOYLE, CF ;
REISER, BJ .
SCIENCE, 1985, 228 (4698) :456-462
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, SKILLS ARGUMENT, DOI [DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511571350, 10.1017/CBO9780511571350]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Schemas in Problem Solving
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TAKING SCI SCH LEARN, DOI DOI 10.17226/11625
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1997, JASP PROJ LESS CURR
[7]  
[Anonymous], CONTEXTS LEARNING SO
[8]   Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Winters, Fielding I. ;
Crornley, Jennifer G. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (01) :45-72
[9]   Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning [J].
Barab, SA ;
Plucker, JA .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2002, 37 (03) :165-182
[10]   Designing and building an on-line community: The struggle to support sociability in the inquiry learning forum [J].
Barab, SA ;
MaKinster, JG ;
Moore, JA ;
Cunningham, DJ .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 49 (04) :71-96