Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Evaluating the Response to Neoadjuvant Breast Cancer Treatment

被引:69
作者
Belli, Paolo [1 ]
Costantini, Melania [1 ]
Ierardi, Carmine [1 ]
Bufi, Enida [1 ]
Amato, Daniele [1 ]
Mule', Antonino [2 ]
Nardone, Luigia [3 ]
Terribile, Daniela [4 ]
Bonomo, Lorenzo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Biosci & Radiol Imaging, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Pathol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Radiotherapy, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Dept Surg, Breast Unit, I-00168 Rome, Italy
关键词
apparent diffusion coefficient; breast cancer; magnetic resonance imaging; neoadjuvant treatment; response; CONTRAST-ENHANCED MRI; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY; PATHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; WATER DIFFUSION; TUMOR RESPONSE; MODEL SYSTEMS; RAT GLIOMA; IN-VIVO;
D O I
10.1111/j.1524-4741.2011.01160.x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the role of diffusion imaging in the evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment by correlating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value changes with pathological response. From June 2007 to June 2009, all consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (including diffusion sequence) before and after neoadjuvant treatment. The ADC values obtained using two different methods of region of interest (ROI) placement before and after treatment were compared with MRI response (assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria) and pathological response (assessed using Mandard's classification). Fifty-one women (mean age 48.41 years) were included in this study. Morphological MRI (RECIST classification) well evaluated the responder status after chemotherapy (TRG class; area-under-the-curve 0.865). Mean pretreatment ADC values obtained with the two different methods of ROI placement were 1.11 and 1.02 x 10(-3) mm(2)/seconds. Mean post-treatment ADC values were 1.40 and 1.35 x 10(-3) mm(2)/seconds, respectively. A significant inverse correlation between mean ADC increase and Mandard's classifications was observed for both the methods of ADC measurements. Diagnostic performance analysis revealed that the single ROI method has a superior diagnostic accuracy compared with the multiple ROIs method (accuracy: 82% versus 74%). The coupling of the diffusion imaging with the established morphological MRI provides superior evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients compared with morphological MRI alone. There is a potential in the future to optimize patient therapy on the basis of ADC value changes. Additional works are needed to determine whether these preliminary observed changes in tumor diffusion are a universal response to tumor cell death, and to more fully delineate the ability of ADC value changes in early recognizing responder from nonresponder patients.
引用
收藏
页码:610 / 619
页数:10
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]
Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI [J].
Balu-Maestro, C ;
Chapellier, C ;
Bleuse, A ;
Chanalet, I ;
Chauvel, C ;
Largillier, R .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 72 (02) :145-152
[2]
A necessary role for cell shrinkage in apoptosis [J].
Bortner, CD ;
Cidlowski, JA .
BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1998, 56 (12) :1549-1559
[3]
Quantification of tumor tissue populations by multispectral analysis [J].
Carano, RAD ;
Ross, AL ;
Ross, J ;
Williams, SP ;
Koeppen, H ;
Schwall, RH ;
Van Bruggen, N .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (03) :542-551
[4]
Biologic markers as predictors of clinical outcome from systemic therapy for primary operable breast cancer [J].
Chang, J ;
Powles, TJ ;
Allred, DC ;
Ashey, SE ;
Clark, GM ;
Makris, A ;
Assersohn, L ;
Gregory, RK ;
Osborne, CK ;
Dowsett, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (10) :3058-3063
[5]
MRI evaluation of pathologically complete response and residual tumors in breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy [J].
Chen, Jeon Hor ;
Feig, Lyon ;
Agrawal, Garima ;
Yu, Hon ;
Carpenter, Philip M. ;
Mehta, Rita S. ;
Nalcioglu, Orhan ;
Su, Min Ying .
CANCER, 2008, 112 (01) :17-26
[6]
Invasive ductal breast carcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: Noninvasive monitoring with functional MR imaging - Pilot study [J].
Delille, JP ;
Slaneta, PJ ;
Yeh, ED ;
Halpern, EF ;
Kopans, DB ;
Garrido, L .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (01) :63-69
[7]
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]
Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: Cancer therapeutics [J].
Evelhoch, JL ;
Gillies, RJ ;
Karczmar, GS ;
Koutcher, JA ;
Maxwell, RJ ;
Nalcioglu, O ;
Raghunand, N ;
Ronen, SM ;
Ross, BD ;
Swartz, HM .
NEOPLASIA, 2000, 2 (1-2) :152-165
[9]
Diffusion-weighted MRI and response to anti-cancer therapies [J].
Galons, JP ;
Morse, DL ;
Jennings, DR ;
Gillies, RJ .
ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2003, 43 (1-2) :91-101
[10]
LOCAL ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - CONTRAST-ENHANCED SUBTRACTION MR-IMAGING OF RESPONSE TO PREOPERATIVE CHEMOTHERAPY [J].
GILLES, R ;
GUINEBRETIERE, JM ;
TOUSSAINT, C ;
SPIELMAN, M ;
RIETJENS, M ;
PETIT, JY ;
CONTESSO, G ;
MASSELOT, J ;
VANEL, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 191 (03) :633-638