Worldwide patterns of bronchodilator responsiveness: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study

被引:71
作者
Tan, Wan C. [1 ]
Vollmer, William M. [2 ]
Lamprecht, Bernd [3 ]
Mannino, David M. [4 ]
Jithoo, Anamika [5 ]
Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa [6 ]
Mejza, Filip [6 ]
Gislason, Thorarinn [7 ]
Burney, Peter G. J. [5 ]
Buist, A. Sonia [8 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, UBC iCapture Ctr CardioPulm Res, St Pauls Hosp, UBC James Hogg Res Labs,Providence Heart & Lung I, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada
[2] Kaizer Permanente, Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR USA
[3] Paracelsus Private Med Univ Salzburg, Dept Pulm Med, Salzburg, Austria
[4] Univ Kentucky, Div Pulm Crit Care & Sleep Med, Lexington, KY USA
[5] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Resp Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, London, England
[6] Jagiellonian Univ, Dept Resp Dis, Coll Med, Krakow, Poland
[7] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Resp Med & Sleep, Reykjavik, Iceland
[8] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Portland, OR 97201 USA
关键词
SHORT-TERM VARIABILITY; REVERSIBILITY; COPD; FLOW; FEV1; REPRODUCIBILITY; POPULATION; RESPONSES; AMERICAN; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201445
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Rationale Criteria for a clinically significant bronchodilator response (BDR) are mainly based on studies in patients with obstructive lung diseases. Little is known about the BDR in healthy general populations, and even less about the worldwide patterns. Methods 10 360 adults aged 40 years and older from 14 countries in North America, Europe, Africa and Asia participated in the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Spirometry was used before and after an inhaled bronchodilator to determine the distribution of the BDR in population-based samples of healthy non-smokers and individuals with airflow obstruction. Results In 3922 healthy never smokers, the weighted pooled estimate of the 95th percentiles (95% CI) for bronchodilator response were 284 ml (263 to 305) absolute change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s from baseline (Delta FEV1); 12.0% (11.2% to 12.8%) change relative to initial value (%Delta FEV1i); and 10.0% (9.5% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (%Delta FEV1p). The corresponding mean changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) were 322 ml (271 to 373) absolute change from baseline (Delta FVC); 10.5% (8.9% to 12.0%) change relative to initial value (Delta FVCi); and 9.2% (7.9% to 10.5%) change relative to predicted value (Delta FVCp). The proportion who exceeded the above threshold values in the subgroup with spirometrically defined Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 2 and higher (FEV1/FVC <0.7 and FEV1% predicted <80%) were 11.1%, 30.8% and 12.9% respectively for the FEV1-based thresholds and 22.6%, 28.6% and 22.1% respectively for the FVC-based thresholds. Conclusions The results provide reference values for bronchodilator responses worldwide that confirm guideline estimates for a clinically significant level of BDR in bronchodilator testing.
引用
收藏
页码:718 / 726
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[2]
LUNG-FUNCTION TESTING - SELECTION OF REFERENCE VALUES AND INTERPRETATIVE STRATEGIES [J].
不详 .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1991, 144 (05) :1202-1218
[3]
[Anonymous], 1974, Chest, V65, P552
[4]
Bronchodilator response in the lung health study over 11 yrs [J].
Anthonisen, NR ;
Lindgren, PG ;
Tashkin, DP ;
Kanner, RE ;
Scanlon, PD ;
Connett, JE .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (01) :45-51
[5]
ANTHONISEN NR, 1986, AM REV RESPIR DIS, V133, P814
[6]
INTERPRETATION OF BRONCHODILATOR RESPONSE IN PATIENTS WITH OBSTRUCTIVE AIRWAYS DISEASE [J].
BRAND, PLP ;
QUANJER, PH ;
POSTMA, DS ;
KERSTJENS, HAM ;
KOETER, GH ;
DEKHUIJZEN, PNR ;
SLUITER, HJ .
THORAX, 1992, 47 (06) :429-436
[7]
International variation in the prevalence of COPD (The BOLD Study): a population-based prevalence study [J].
Buist, A. Sonia ;
McBurnie, Mary Ann ;
Vollmer, William M. ;
Gillespie, Suzanne ;
Burney, Peter ;
Mannino, David M. ;
Menezes, Ana M. B. ;
Sullivan, Sean D. ;
Lee, Todd A. ;
Weiss, Kevin B. ;
Jensen, Robert L. ;
Marks, Guy B. ;
Gulsvik, Amund ;
Nizankowska-Mogilnicka, Ewa .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9589) :741-750
[8]
Buist A Sonia, 2005, COPD, V2, P277, DOI 10.1081/COPD-200057610
[9]
Bronchodilator reversibility testing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Calverley, PMA ;
Burge, PS ;
Spencer, S ;
Anderson, JA ;
Jones, PW .
THORAX, 2003, 58 (08) :659-664
[10]
CLINICAL INTERPRETATION OF AIRWAY RESPONSE TO A BRONCHODILATOR - EPIDEMIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS [J].
DALES, RE ;
SPITZER, WO ;
TOUSIGNANT, P ;
SCHECHTER, M ;
SUISSA, S .
AMERICAN REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 1988, 138 (02) :317-320