Risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women at greater than 41 weeks' gestational age with an unengaged vertex

被引:20
作者
Shin, KS
Brubaker, KL
Ackerson, LM
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Milpitas, CA 95035 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Santa Clara, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; nulliparity; engagement;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(03)00909-8
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an unengaged vertex significantly increased the risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous patients at 41 weeks or greater. Study design: The medical records from all nulliparous patients greater than 41 weeks' gestation delivered at a single institution were reviewed. Patients undergoing both spontaneous and induced labor were included. Multivariate analyses were used to compare the influence of admission fetal station versus induction of labor on the risk of cesarean delivery. Results: Four hundred forty-eight nulliparous women at greater than 41 weeks' gestation were delivered at our institution during the study period. Sixty-two percent of these patients underwent induction of labor. There was a statistically significant increase in cesarean delivery rate compared with station (6% of patients at -1 station, 20% at -2 station, 43% at -3 station, and 77% at -4 station; P=.001). Compared with patients with an engaged vertex, patients with an unengaged vertex had 12.4 times the risk of cesarean delivery. Most of the cesarean deliveries were performed for failure to progress. On the basis of multivariate analysis, the odds of cesarean delivery were better predicted by fetal station than induction of labor. Conclusion: Nulliparous patients at 41 weeks or greater with an unengaged vertex are 12.4 times more likely to be delivered by cesarean section than a patient with an engaged vertex. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Prolonged pregnancy: Induction of labor and cesarean births [J].
Alexander, JM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) :911-915
[2]  
*AM COLL OBST GYNE, 1997, MAN POSTT PREGN
[3]  
BISHOP EH, 1964, OBSTET GYNECOL, V24, P266
[4]  
CUNNINGHAM GF, 2001, WILLIAMS OBSTETRICS, P729
[5]  
DIVON MY, 2002, OBESTETRICS NORMAL P
[6]   MANAGEMENT OF PROLONGED PREGNANCY - INDUCTION OF LABOR VERSUS ANTEPARTUM FETAL TESTING [J].
DYSON, DC ;
MILLER, PD ;
ARMSTRONG, MA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 156 (04) :928-934
[7]  
Falzone S, 1998, J REPROD MED, V43, P676
[8]  
FRIEDMAN EA, 1976, OBSTET GYNECOL, V47, P129
[9]   INDUCTION OF LABOR AS COMPARED WITH SERIAL ANTENATAL MONITORING IN POSTTERM PREGNANCY - A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
HANNAH, ME ;
HANNAH, WJ ;
HELLMANN, J ;
HEWSON, S ;
MILNER, R ;
WILLAN, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (24) :1587-1592
[10]   Elective induction of labor as a risk factor for cesarean delivery among low-risk women at term [J].
Maslow, AS ;
Sweeny, AL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (06) :917-922