Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology

被引:401
作者
Szulczewski, Michael L. [1 ]
MacMinn, Christopher W. [2 ]
Herzog, Howard J. [3 ]
Juanes, Ruben [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] MIT, Dept Mech Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] MIT, Energy Initiat, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] MIT, Ctr Computat Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
carbon sequestration; pressure dissipation; residual trapping; solubility trapping; CO2; STORAGE; AQUIFERS; DIOXIDE; STABILIZATION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.1115347109
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In carbon capture and storage (CCS), CO2 is captured at power plants and then injected underground into reservoirs like deep saline aquifers for long-term storage. While CCS may be critical for the continued use of fossil fuels in a carbon-constrained world, the deployment of CCS has been hindered by uncertainty in geologic storage capacities and sustainable injection rates, which has contributed to the absence of concerted government policy. Here, we clarify the potential of CCS to mitigate emissions in the United States by developing a storage-capacity supply curve that, unlike current large-scale capacity estimates, is derived from the fluid mechanics of CO2 injection and trapping and incorporates injection-rate constraints. We show that storage supply is a dynamic quantity that grows with the duration of CCS, and we interpret the lifetime of CCS as the time for which the storage supply curve exceeds the storage demand curve from CO2 production. We show that in the United States, if CO2 production from power generation continues to rise at recent rates, then CCS can store enough CO2 to stabilize emissions at current levels for at least 100 y. This result suggests that the large-scale implementation of CCS is a geologically viable climate-change mitigation option in the United States over the next century.
引用
收藏
页码:5185 / 5189
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Report of the Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, CO2 emissions from fuel combustion, highlights
[3]  
[Anonymous], FUTURE COAL INTERDIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], CARB SEQ ATL US CAN
[5]   CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps [J].
Bachu, Stefan ;
Bonijoly, Didier ;
Bradshaw, John ;
Burruss, Robert ;
Holloway, Sam ;
Christensen, Niels Peter ;
Mathiassen, Odd Magne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) :430-443
[6]   DISPOSAL OF CARBON-DIOXIDE IN AQUIFERS IN THE US [J].
BERGMAN, PD ;
WINTER, EM .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1995, 36 (6-9) :523-526
[7]   Modelling carbon dioxide accumulation at Sleipner: Implications for underground carbon storage [J].
Bickle, Mike ;
Chadwick, Andy ;
Huppert, Herbert E. ;
Hallworth, Mark ;
Lyle, Sarah .
EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2007, 255 (1-2) :164-176
[8]   Large-scale impact of CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers: A sensitivity study on pressure response in stratified systems [J].
Birkholzer, Jens T. ;
Zhou, Quanlin ;
Tsang, Chin-Fu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (02) :181-194
[9]  
Dooley J., 2005, GREENHOUSE GAS CONTR, V7, P593, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-008044704-9/50060-4
[10]   Valuing national and basin level geologic CO2 storage capacity assessments in a broader context [J].
Dooley, James J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (01) :177-+