Evaluation and comparison of the IRS-P6 and the landsat sensors

被引:61
作者
Chander, Gyanesh [1 ]
Coan, Michael J.
Scaramuzza, Pasquale L.
机构
[1] Sci Applicat Int Corp, San Diego, CA 92121 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Ctr Earth Resource Observat & Sci, Sioux Falls, SD 57198 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING | 2008年 / 46卷 / 01期
关键词
Advanced Wide-Field Sensor (AWiFS); calibration; canopy; characterization; Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM plus ); impervious; Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS-P6); land cover; Landsat; medium-resolution Linear Imaging Self-Scanner (LISS-III); reflectance; ResourceSat-1; spectral bands;
D O I
10.1109/TGRS.2007.907426
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Indian Remote Sensing Satellite (IRS-P6), also called ResourceSat-1 was launched in a polar sun-synchronous orbit on October 17, 2003. It carries three sensors: the high-resolution Linear Imaging Self-Scanner (LISS-IV), the medium-resolution Linear Imaging Self-Scanner (LISS-III), and the Advanced Wide-Field Sensor (AWiFS). These three sensors provide images of different resolutions and coverage. To understand the absolute radiometric calibration accuracy of IRS-P6 AWiFS and LISS-III sensors, image pairs from these sensors were compared to images from the Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper (TM) and Landsat-7 Enhanced TM Plus (ETM+) sensors. The approach involves calibration of surface observations based on image statistics from areas observed nearly simultaneously by the two sensors. This paper also evaluated the viability of data from these next-generation imagers for use in creating three National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD) products: land cover, percent tree canopy, and percent impervious surface. Individual products were consistent with previous studies but had slightly lower overall accuracies as compared to data from the Landsat sensors.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 221
页数:13
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], MULTIRESOLUTION LAND
  • [2] Landsat-5 TM reflective-band absolute radiometric calibration
    Chander, G
    Helder, DL
    Markham, BL
    Dewald, JD
    Kaita, E
    Thome, KJ
    Micijevic, E
    Ruggles, TA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (12): : 2747 - 2760
  • [3] Cross calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and EO-1 ALI sensor
    Chander, G
    Meyer, DJ
    Helder, DL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 42 (12): : 2821 - 2831
  • [4] Revised Landsat-5 TM radiometric calibration procedures and postcalibration dynamic ranges
    Chander, G
    Markham, B
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2003, 41 (11): : 2674 - 2677
  • [5] CHANDER G, 2005, P SPIE INT S SAN DIE, V5882
  • [6] Cross-calibration of the Landsat-7 ETM+ and Landsat-5 TM with the ResourceSat-1 (IRS-P6) AWiFS and LISS-III sensors
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Scaramuzza, Pat L.
    [J]. GEOSS AND NEXT - GENERATION SENSORS AND MISSIONS, 2006, 6407
  • [7] Revised Landsat-5 thematic mapper radiometric calibration
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Markham, Brian L.
    Barsi, Julia A.
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2007, 4 (03) : 490 - 494
  • [8] *GEOEYE, RES 1 ORB COV DET
  • [9] Development of a 2001 National Land-Cover Database for the United States
    Homer, C
    Huang, CQ
    Yang, LM
    Wylie, B
    Coan, M
    [J]. PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 70 (07) : 829 - 840
  • [10] Homer C, 2007, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V73, P337