Design principles for regulator gene expression in a repressible gene circuit

被引:47
作者
Wall, ME
Hlavacek, WS
Savageau, MA
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Theoret Biol & Biophys Grp T 10, Div Theoret, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Comp & Computat Sci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[3] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Biosci Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Dept Microbiol & Immunol, Sch Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
gene regulation; repression; design principles; mathematical model; autoregulation;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-2836(03)00948-3
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We consider the design of a type of repressible gene circuit that is common in bacteria. In this type of circuit, a regulator protein acts to coordinately repress the expression of effector genes when a signal molecule with which it interacts is present. The regulator protein can also independently influence the expression of its own gene, such that regulator gene expression is repressible (like effector genes), constitutive, or inducible. Thus, a signal-directed change in the activity of the regulator protein can result in one of three patterns of coupled regulator and effector gene expression: direct coupling, in which regulator and effector gene expression change in the same direction; uncoupling, in which regulator gene expression remains constant while effector gene expression changes; or inverse coupling, in which regulator and effector gene expression change in opposite directions. We have investigated the functional consequences of each form of coupling using a mathematical model to compare alternative circuits on the basis of engineering-inspired criteria for functional effectiveness. The results depend on whether the regulator protein acts as a repressor or activator of transcription at the promoters of effector genes. In the case of repressor control of effector gene expression, direct coupling is optimal among the three forms of coupling, whereas in the case of activator control, inverse coupling is optimal. Results also depend on the sensitivity of effector gene expression to changes in the level of a signal molecule; the optimal form of coupling can be physically realized only for circuits with sufficiently small sensitivity. These theoretical results provide a rationale for autoregulation of regulator genes in repressible gene circuits and lead to testable predictions, which we have compared with data available in the literature and electronic databases. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:861 / 876
页数:16
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Effect of overall feedback inhibition in unbranched biosynthetic pathways [J].
Alves, R ;
Savageau, MA .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 79 (05) :2290-2304
[2]   Comparing systemic properties of ensembles of biological networks by graphical and statistical methods [J].
Alves, R ;
Savageau, MA .
BIOINFORMATICS, 2000, 16 (06) :527-533
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium: Cellular and Molecular Biology
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Biological Regulation and Development, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-3417-0_12
[5]   FERRIC UPTAKE REGULATION PROTEIN ACTS AS A REPRESSOR, EMPLOYING IRON(II) AS A COFACTOR TO BIND THE OPERATOR OF AN IRON TRANSPORT OPERON IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
BAGG, A ;
NEILANDS, JB .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1987, 26 (17) :5471-5477
[6]  
BAKER TI, 1966, J BIOL CHEM, V241, P5577
[7]   Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation [J].
Becskei, A ;
Serrano, L .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6786) :590-593
[8]   ROLE OF FEEDBACK INHIBITION IN STABILIZING THE CLASSICAL OPERON [J].
BLISS, RD ;
PAINTER, PR ;
MARR, AG .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1982, 97 (02) :177-193
[9]   DECAY-RATES OF DIFFERENT MESSENGER-RNA IN ESCHERICHIA-COLI AND MODELS OF DECAY [J].
BLUNDELL, M ;
CRAIG, E ;
KENNELL, D .
NATURE-NEW BIOLOGY, 1972, 238 (80) :46-&
[10]   AUTO-REGULATION OF THE TYRR GENE [J].
CAMAKARIS, H ;
PITTARD, J .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1982, 150 (01) :70-75