The long-term costs of preterm birth and low birth weight: results of a systematic review

被引:167
作者
Petrou, S
Sach, T
Davidson, L
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Inst Hlth Sci, Natl Perinatal Epidemiol Unit, Oxford OX3 7LF, England
[2] Univ York, Dept Econ & Related Studies, York YO1, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
systematic review; costs; long-term; preterm birth; low birth weight;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2214.2001.00203.x
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
The high rates of morbidity and mortality arising from preterm birth and low birth weight impose an immense burden on the health, education and social services, and on families. This paper presents the results of a systematic review of the published and unpublished evidence regarding the long-term economic implications of preterm birth and low birth weight for various sectors of the economy and for individuals. The paper highlights the variable methodological quality of the bulk of long-term economic studies of preterm birth and low birth weight and suggests ways in which these methodological limitations can be overcome. The paper reveals that preterm birth and low birth weight can result in substantial costs to the health sector following the infant's initial discharge from hospital. It can also impose a substantial burden on special education and social services, on families and carers of the infants and on society generally. In addition to the costs identified by the literature, preterm birth and low birth weight can have other long-term consequences that require evaluation from an economic perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 115
页数:19
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Birth Counts: Statistics of Pregnancy and Childbirth
[2]   ECONOMIC OUTCOMES OF COLFOSCERIL PALMITATE RESCUE THERAPY IN INFANTS WEIGHING 1250G OR MORE WITH RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS SYNDROME - RESULTS FROM A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BACKHOUSE, ME ;
MAUSKOPF, JA ;
JONES, D ;
WOLD, DE ;
SCHUMACHER, R ;
COTTON, R ;
LONG, WA .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1994, 6 (04) :358-369
[3]  
BACKHOUSE ME, 1992, HLTH EC S, V1, P1
[4]   ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
SINCLAIR, JC ;
HORWOOD, SP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (22) :1330-1337
[5]   SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN ECONOMIC-EVALUATION - A REVIEW OF PUBLISHED STUDIES [J].
BRIGGS, A ;
SCULPHER, M .
HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1995, 4 (05) :355-371
[6]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF EARLY HOSPITAL DISCHARGE AND HOME FOLLOW-UP OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
BROOTEN, D ;
KUMAR, S ;
BROWN, LP ;
BUTTS, P ;
FINKLER, SA ;
BAKEWELLSACHS, S ;
GIBBONS, A ;
DELIVORIAPAPADOPOULOS, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 315 (15) :934-939
[7]   THE IMPACT OF LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT ON SPECIAL-EDUCATION COSTS [J].
CHAIKIND, S ;
CORMAN, H .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 1991, 10 (03) :291-311
[8]  
Doyle LW, 1997, J PAEDIATR CHILD H, V33, P202
[9]   Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ [J].
Drummond, MF ;
Jefferson, TO .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 313 (7052) :275-283
[10]   HEALTH-CARE CBA CEA - AN UPDATE ON THE GROWTH AND COMPOSITION OF THE LITERATURE [J].
ELIXHAUSER, A ;
LUCE, BR ;
TAYLOR, WR ;
REBLANDO, J .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (07) :JS1-JS11