Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl

被引:316
作者
Hasse, JE
Lathrop, RG
机构
[1] Rowan Univ, Dept Geog & Anthropol, Glassboro, NJ 08028 USA
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Ctr Remote Sensing & Spatial Anal, New Brunswick, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
urban sprawl; environmental indicators; urban impacts; land use/land cover change;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.002
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Sprawl has been loosely defined as dispersed and inefficient urban growth. We propose a series of five indicators that examine the per capita consumption of land taken in new development in relation to several critical land resource impacts associated to sprawl including: (1) density of new urbanization; (2) loss of prime farmland; (3) loss of natural wetlands; (4) loss of core forest habitat; and (5) increase of impervious surface. These Land Resource Impact (LRI) indicators were measured for each of New Jersey's 566 municipalities using a 1986 to 1995 land use/land cover digital database along with US Census population data. By integrating population growth with land resource loss a more nuanced interpretation of land use change is provided than in previous analyses of sprawl. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 175
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AM FARML TRUST, 1997, FARM EDG, V2
[2]  
American Farmland Trust, 1994, FARM EDG NEW LOOK IM
[3]  
Anderson J.R., 1976, 964 US GEOL SURV, DOI DOI 10.3133/PP964
[4]  
[Anonymous], 39 TCRP
[5]  
[Anonymous], MEASURING SPRAWL ITS
[6]   Impervious surface coverage - The emergence of a key environmental indicator [J].
Arnold, CL ;
Gibbons, CJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1996, 62 (02) :243-258
[7]   Impervious surfaces and water quality: A review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning [J].
Brabec, E ;
Schulte, S ;
Richards, PL .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING LITERATURE, 2002, 16 (04) :499-514
[8]  
BURCHELL RW, 1999, HASTINGS W NW J ENV, V5, P137
[9]  
Carliner MS, 1999, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V10, P549
[10]  
Downs A., 1998, The Brookings Review, V16, P8, DOI DOI 10.2307/20080808