Models of innovation: Startups and mature corporations

被引:133
作者
Freeman, John [1 ]
Engel, Jerome S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Lester Ctr Enterpreneurship & Innovat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Haas Sch Business, Enterpreneurship Program, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/41166418
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The innovation process occurs in two ways, the Corporate Model and the Entrepreneurship model. Corporations have many competitive advantages that they can use to succeed against startups. In a one-on-one competition, the startup usually has less capital, fewer scientists and engineers, less legitimacy or brand presence, fewer strategic alliances, evolving organizational structures, and incomplete or even non-existent business processes. Young firms have the liabilities of newness and smallness, so they fail at higher rates than do their larger and older competitors. However, the structural and managerial advantages associated with established companies also disadvantage them. Innovation requires two important underlying conditions. First, resources must be mobile. Second, incentives must be aligned so that those who provide these resources, especially financial resources, succeed along with innovators who are engaged in risky activities that generally require extraordinary levels of effort. When resources are immobile, and incentives are misaligned, the innovation process in established firms slows. Under these circumstances, entrepreneurs can start companies, develop the capabilities of those companies, and bring new products to market relatively quickly.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / +
页数:27
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   INNOVATION - MAPPING THE WINDS OF CREATIVE DESTRUCTION [J].
ABERNATHY, WJ ;
CLARK, KB .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1985, 14 (01) :3-22
[2]  
ALBERNATHY WJ, 1978, TECHNOL REV, V14, P41
[3]  
BALU PM, 1970, AM SOCIOL REV, V35, P201
[4]   The Red Queen in organizational evolution [J].
Barnett, WP ;
Hansen, MT .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 17 :139-157
[5]   Strategy as vector and the inertia of coevolutionary lock-in [J].
Burgelman, RA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2002, 47 (02) :325-357
[6]  
BURNS T, 1961, CLASSICS ORG THEORY
[7]   ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE [J].
CAPLOW, T .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1957, 1 (04) :484-505
[8]   ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY - A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION [J].
COHEN, WM ;
LEVINTHAL, DA .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1990, 35 (01) :128-152
[9]  
Cyert R. M., 1963, BEHAV THEORY FIRM
[10]  
FREEMAN JH, 2001, ADV STUDY ENTREPRENE, V10, P639