Detection of C-reactive protein utilizing magnetic permeability detection based immunoassays

被引:62
作者
Kriz, K
Ibraimi, F
Lu, M
Hansson, LO
Kriz, D
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Pure & Appl Biochem, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Med Sci, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] LifeAssays AB, SE-22370 Lund, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ac0508649
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A new sensing technology platform integrating magnetic permeability detection and a two-site heterogeneous immunoassay in a one-step analysis is described. As a platform model, measurements of C-reactive protein (CRP), a cardiac and inflammation marker, were performed in a rapid (11.5 min) high-sensitivity (hs) procedure with a low detection limit (0.2 mg/L) and accuracy (CV = 11%). The two-site heterogeneous immunoassay was performed in 1.2-mL disposable reagents vials containing solid phase (polyclonal anti-CRP conjugated silica microparticles), labeling agent (monoclonal anti-CRP conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles), and reaction buffer. Whole blood (20 mu L) was assayed by introducing the sample into a reagent vial using a glass capillary and mixing its contents by hand for 30 s. After a 11-min sedimentation step, the vial was placed into the coil of the magnetic permeability detector, which measured the enrichment of superparamagnetic nanoparticles in the solid-phase sediment Magnetic permeability detection and quantification is based on the principle that when paramagnetic materials are placed inside a coil, the inductance of the coil is influenced. Screening of CRP on whole blood patient samples showed good correlation with central hospital measurements for hsCRP (y = 1.018x - 0.021, R-2 = 0.980, n = 103) and normal range CRP (y = 1.02x + 2.53, R-2 = 0.991, n = 33) analyses. The mean differences of the two methods according to the Bland and Altman plots were -0.03 +/- 1.12 mg/L for hsCRP analysis and -3.4 +/- 8.64 mg/L for normal range CRP analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:5920 / 5924
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   A preliminary study on DNA detection based on relative magnetic permeability measurements and histone HI conjugated superparamagnetic nanoparticles as magnetic tracers [J].
Abrahamsson, D ;
Kriz, KB ;
Lu, M ;
Kriz, D .
BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2004, 19 (11) :1549-1557
[2]   BIOMAGNETIC NEUROSENSORS .3. NONINVASIVE SENSORS USING MAGNETIC STIMULATION AND BIOMAGNETIC DETECTION [J].
BABB, CW ;
COON, DR ;
RECHNITZ, GA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1995, 67 (04) :763-769
[3]   Measurement of cytokines in clinical samples using immunoassays: Problems and pitfalls [J].
Banks, RE .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCES, 2000, 37 (02) :131-182
[4]   A biosensor based on magnetoresistance technology [J].
Baselt, DR ;
Lee, GU ;
Natesan, M ;
Metzger, SW ;
Sheehan, PE ;
Colton, RJ .
BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 1998, 13 (7-8) :731-739
[5]   Biosensor based on force microscope technology [J].
Baselt, DR ;
Lee, GU ;
Colton, RJ .
JOURNAL OF VACUUM SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY B, 1996, 14 (02) :789-793
[6]   HIGHER ANTI-TUMOR EFFICACY OF DAUNOMYCIN WHEN LINKED TO DEXTRAN - INVIVO AND INVITRO STUDIES [J].
BERNSTEIN, A ;
HURWITZ, E ;
MARON, R ;
ARNON, R ;
SELA, M ;
WILCHEK, M .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1978, 60 (02) :379-384
[7]   The new era of automated immunoassay [J].
Bock, JL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2000, 113 (05) :628-646
[8]   Antibodies in diagnostics - from immunoassays to protein chips [J].
Borrebaeck, CAK .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 2000, 21 (08) :379-382
[9]   ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY (ELISA) QUANTITATIVE ASSAY OF IMMUNOGLOBULIN-G [J].
ENGVALL, E ;
PERLMANN, P .
IMMUNOCHEMISTRY, 1971, 8 (09) :871-&
[10]   Magnetoresistive-based biosensors and biochips [J].
Graham, DL ;
Ferreira, HA ;
Freitas, PP .
TRENDS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2004, 22 (09) :455-462