The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results

被引:277
作者
Brander, Luke M. [1 ]
Koetse, Mark J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Environm Studies IVM, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Dept Spatial Econ, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Urban open space; Meta-analysis; Contingent valuation; Hedonic pricing; RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY-VALUES; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; ECONOMIC VALUE; AMENITY BENEFITS; PUBLIC DEMAND; GREEN SPACE; FOREST; PREFERENCE; GOODS; LAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban open space provides a number of valuable services to urban populations, including recreational opportunities, aesthetic enjoyment, environmental functions, and may also be associated with existence values. In separate meta-analyses of the contingent valuation (CV) and hedonic pricing (HP) literature we examine which physical, socio-economic, and study characteristics determine the value of open space. The dependent variable in the CV meta-regression is defined as the value of open space per hectare per year in 2003 US$, and in the HP model as the percentage change in house price for a 10 m decrease in distance to open space. Using a multi-level modelling approach we find in both the CV and HP analyses that there is a positive and significant relationship between the value of urban open space and population density, indicating that scarcity and crowdedness matter, and that the value of open space does not vary significantly with income. Further, urban parks are more highly valued than other types of urban open space (forests, agricultural and undeveloped land) and methodological differences in study design have a large influence on estimated values from both CV and HP. We also find important regional differences in preferences for urban open space, which suggests that the potential for transferring estimated values between regions is likely to be limited. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2763 / 2773
页数:11
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   Open space, residential property values, and spatial context [J].
Anderson, Soren T. ;
West, Sarah E. .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2006, 36 (06) :773-789
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[3]  
BATEMAN I, 2004, APPL ENV EC GIS APPR
[4]   Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Jones, AP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (02) :235-258
[5]   ELICITATION AND TRUNCATION EFFECTS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDIES [J].
BATEMAN, IJ ;
LANGFORD, IH ;
TURNER, RK ;
WILLIS, KG ;
GARROD, GD .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 12 (02) :161-179
[6]   The public demand for open space: The case of Connecticut communities [J].
Bates, LJ ;
Santerre, RE .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 50 (01) :97-111
[7]  
Bergstrom John C., 1985, SO J AGR EC, V17, P139
[8]  
Bishop K., 1992, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V35, P63, DOI 10.1080/09640569208711908
[9]   VALUING URBAN LAKEVIEW AMENITIES USING IMPLICIT AND CONTINGENT MARKETS [J].
BLOMQUIST, G .
URBAN STUDIES, 1988, 25 (04) :333-340
[10]   The impact of open spaces on property values in Portland, Oregon [J].
Bolitzer, B ;
Netusil, NR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 59 (03) :185-193