Molecular characterization of genomic AML1-ETO fusions in childhood leukemia

被引:40
作者
Xiao, Z
Greaves, MF
Buffler, P
Smith, MT
Segal, MR
Dicks, BM
Wiencke, JK
Wiemels, JL [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Lab Mol Epidemiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Inst Canc Res, Leukaemia Res Fund Ctr, London SW3 6JB, England
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Div Publ Hlth Biol & Epidemiol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Div Environm Hlth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
translocation; acute myeloid leukemia; AML1; ETO; cluster;
D O I
10.1038/sj.leu.2402318
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
T(8;21) AML1(CBFA2)-ETO(MTG8) is the most common chromosomal translocation in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in both children and adults. We sought to understand the structure and gain insight into the fusion process between AML1 and ETO by sequencing genomic fusions in 17 primary childhood AMLs and two cell lines with t(8;21). Reciprocal translocations were sequenced for seven of the 19 samples. We assumed a null hypothesis that the translocation breakpoints would be evenly distributed along the intronic breakpoint cluster regions. Testing for multimodality via smoothed bootstrap statistical methods suggested, however, the presence of two separate cluster regions within both the AML1 and ETO breakpoint cluster regions. ETO breakpoints were predominantly located in intron 1B in a defined cluster 5' of exon 1A (scan statistic P value = 0.00001). All patients with available RNA expressed an AML1-ETO mRNA fusion between exon 5 of AML1 and exon 2 of ETO. Since the structural restraints for the fusion protein of AML1-ETO exclude exon 1A, we reason that ETO intron 1B harbors a structural feature with propensity for breakage and/or recombination. Chromosomal breakpoints displayed evidence of fusion by a non-homologous end joining process, with microhomologies and nontemplate nucleotides at some fusion junctions. Breakpoints in general displayed similar complexity of duplications, deletions, and insertions to other common pediatric leukemia translocations (TEL-AML1, MLL-AF4, PML-RARA, CBFB-MYH11) that we and others have analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:1906 / 1913
页数:8
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   The t(11;20)(p15;q11) chromosomal translocation associated with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome results in an NUP98-TOP1 fusion [J].
Ahuja, HG ;
Felix, CA ;
Aplan, PD .
BLOOD, 1999, 94 (09) :3258-3261
[2]  
Ahuja HG, 2000, GENE CHROMOSOME CANC, V29, P96, DOI 10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::AID-GCC1013>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-T
[4]  
Alexander FE, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P2542
[5]   Characterization of t(12;21) breakpoint junctions in acute lymphoblastic leukemia [J].
Andersen, MT ;
Nordentoft, I ;
Hjalgrim, LL ;
Christiansen, CL ;
Jakobsen, VD ;
Hjalgrim, H ;
Pallisgaard, N ;
Madsen, HO ;
Christiansen, M ;
Ryder, LP ;
Clausen, N ;
Hokland, P ;
Schmiegelow, K ;
Melbye, M ;
Jorgensen, P .
LEUKEMIA, 2001, 15 (05) :858-859
[6]   DISRUPTION OF THE HUMAN SCL LOCUS BY ILLEGITIMATE V-(D)-J RECOMBINASE ACTIVITY [J].
APLAN, PD ;
LOMBARDI, DP ;
GINSBERG, AM ;
COSSMAN, J ;
BERTNESS, VL ;
KIRSCH, IR .
SCIENCE, 1990, 250 (4986) :1426-1429
[7]  
ASOU H, 1991, BLOOD, V77, P2031
[8]   Cloning and sequence analysis of four t(9;11) therapy-related leukemia breakpoints [J].
Atlas, M ;
Head, D ;
Behm, F ;
Schmidt, E ;
Zeleznik-Le, NJ ;
Roe, BA ;
Burian, D ;
Domer, PH .
LEUKEMIA, 1998, 12 (12) :1895-1902
[9]   Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within the MLL breakpoint cluster region in de novo acute leukemia and in treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia: Correlation with scaffold attachment regions and topoisomerase II consensus binding sites [J].
Broeker, PLS ;
Super, HG ;
Thirman, MJ ;
Pomykala, H ;
Yonebayashi, Y ;
Tanabe, S ;
ZeleznikLe, N ;
Rowley, JD .
BLOOD, 1996, 87 (05) :1912-1922
[10]  
CAVUELA JM, 1997, BLOOD, V90, P3720