Movement and vulnerability of bigeye (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in relation to FADs and natural aggregation points

被引:64
作者
Itano, DG [1 ]
Holland, KN [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hawaii, Joint Inst Marine & Atmospher Res, Pelag Fisheries Res Program, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
基金
美国海洋和大气管理局;
关键词
aggregation; FAD; seamount; tag; yellowfin tuna; bigeye tuna; Thunnus albacares; Thunnus obesus; vulnerability; Pacific Ocean; Hawaii;
D O I
10.1016/S0990-7440(00)01062-7
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
In Hawaii, a variety of small- and medium-scale pelagic fisheries target fishing effort on a network of coastal moored FADs, natural inshore tuna aggregation points, offshore seamounts and offshore weather monitoring buoys. Large-scale longline vessels also operate in the Hawaii exclusive economic zone (EEZ) and beyond. These circumstances provide an ideal setting for tag-and-release experiments designed to elucidate the movement patterns, residence times, exchange rates and vulnerability of bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) and yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) within the Hawaiian EEZ. Preliminary recapture data indicate that FADs, island reef ledges and scamounts exert an overwhelming influence on the catchability of tuna. Recapture rates from these locations vastly outweigh tag returns from open water areas. As of August 31, 1999, a total of 15 387 bigeye and, yellowfin tuna ranging in size fi om 29 to 133 cm fork length (FL) acid from 26 to 143 cm FL respectively (mean 59.8 +/- 14.1 cm; 58.3 +/- 17.3 cm) have been tagged and released throughout the Hawaii EEZ. Recapture rates for both species have been similar with an overall recapture rate of 10.3 %. The location of tag releases reflects the importance of associative behavior and schooling to the vulnerability of tuna; scamounts and FADs accounted fur 72.4 % and 23.5 % of all tag releases. Within the main Hawaiian Island group (excluding the offshore scamounts and buoys), 83.1 % of all recaptures have been made on anchored FADs and 11.9 % of recaptures have come from ledges or tuna aggregation areas close to the islands where bigeye and yellowfin tuna become vulnerable to hook and line Scar. As these studies continue, additional and longer-term recaptures will provide increasingly detailed information on the movement patterns and vulnerability of bigeye and yellowfin tuna as they grow move and recruit to different fisheries. (C) 2000 Ifremer/CNRS/INRA/IRD/Cemagref/Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 223
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BILLS PJ, 1997, SOEST PUBLICATION JI
[2]  
Boggs C.H., 1993, Mar. Fish. Rev., V55, P69
[3]  
BOGGS CH, 1993, MAR FISH REV, V55, P61
[4]  
CURRAN DS, 1996, NOAATMNMFSSWFSC225
[5]   Sca mounts and tuna in the Tropical Eastern Atlantic. [J].
Fonteneau, Alain .
AQUATIC LIVING RESOURCES, 1991, 4 (01) :13-25
[6]  
HAMPTON J, 1993, 31 SPC TUN BILLF ASS
[7]  
Holland KN, 1999, FISH B-NOAA, V97, P392
[8]  
HOLLAND KN, 2000, ACTES C IFREMER, V28
[9]  
Itano D. G., 2000, SOEST PUBLICATION
[10]  
JUNE FC, 1953, FISH WILDLIFE SERVIC, V77, P47