The evolution of mating preferences and major histocompatibility complex genes

被引:553
作者
Penn, DJ [1 ]
Potts, WK [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biol, Salt Lake City, UT 84103 USA
关键词
Red Queen; sexual selection; host-parasite coevolution; heterozygote advantage; inbreeding avoidance; kin recognition;
D O I
10.1086/303166
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
House mice prefer mates genetically dissimilar at the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). The highly polymorphic MHC genes control immunological self/nonself recognition; therefore. this mating preference may function to provide "good genes for an individual's offspring. However, the evidence for MHC-dependent mating preferences is controversial, and its function remains unclear. Here we provide a critical review of the studies on MHC-dependent mating preferences in mice, sheep, and humans and the possible functions of this behavior. There are three adaptive hypotheses for MHC-dependent mating preferences. First, MHC-disassortative mating preferences produce MHC-heterozygous offspring that may have enhanced immunocompetence. Although this hypothesis is not supported by tests of single parasites, MHC heterozygotes may be resistant to multiple parasites. Second, we propose that MHC-dependent mating preferences enable hosts to provide a "moving target" against rapidly evolving parasites that escape immune recognition (the Red Queen hypothesis). Such parasites are suspected to drive MHC diversity through rare-allele advantage. Thus, the two forms of parasite-mediated selection thought to drive MHC diversity, heterozygote and rare-allele advantage, will also favor MHC-dependent mating preferences. Finally, MHC-dependent mating preferences may also function to avoid inbreeding; a hypothesis consistent with other evidence that MHC genes play a role in kin recognition.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 164
页数:20
相关论文
共 159 条
[1]  
ALBERTS SC, 1993, YEARB PHYS ANTHROPOL, V36, P71
[2]  
Allendorf F.W., 1986, P57
[3]   The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex [J].
Apanius, V ;
Penn, D ;
Slev, PR ;
Ruff, LR ;
Potts, WK .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 1997, 17 (02) :179-224
[4]   A DIFFERENTIAL-AVIDITY MODEL FOR T-CELL SELECTION [J].
ASHTONRICKARDT, PG ;
TONEGAWA, S .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 1994, 15 (08) :362-366
[5]   Molecular mimicry in the MHC. Hidden clues to autoimmunity? [J].
Baum, H ;
Davies, H ;
Peakman, M .
IMMUNOLOGY TODAY, 1996, 17 (02) :64-70
[6]   PREWEANING EXPERIENCE IN THE CONTROL OF MATING PREFERENCES BY GENES IN THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX OF THE MOUSE [J].
BEAUCHAMP, GK ;
YAMAZAKI, K ;
BARD, J ;
BOYSE, EA .
BEHAVIOR GENETICS, 1988, 18 (04) :537-547
[7]   Autoimmunity - The pathogen connection [J].
Benoist, C ;
Mathis, D .
NATURE, 1998, 394 (6690) :227-228
[8]   NATURAL VARIANTS OF CYTOTOXIC EPITOPES ARE T-CELL RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS FOR ANTIVIRAL CYTOTOXIC T-CELLS [J].
BERTOLETTI, A ;
SETTE, A ;
CHISARI, FV ;
PENNA, A ;
LEVRERO, M ;
DECARLI, M ;
FIACCADORI, F ;
FERRARI, C .
NATURE, 1994, 369 (6479) :407-410
[9]   SELECTING THE T-CELL RECEPTOR REPERTOIRE [J].
BEVAN, MJ ;
HOGQUIST, KA ;
JAMESON, SC .
SCIENCE, 1994, 264 (5160) :796-797
[10]  
Birkhead TR, 1998, EVOLUTION, V52, P1212, DOI [10.1111/j.1558-5646.1998.tb01848.x, 10.2307/2411251]