Constructing "sound science" and "good epidemiology": Tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms

被引:171
作者
Ong, EK
Glantz, SA
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth Policy Studies, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
The tobacco industry has attacked "junk science" to discredit the evidence that secondhand smoke-among other environmental toxins-causes disease. Philip Morris used public relations firms and lawyers to develop a "sound science" program in the United States and Europe that involved recruiting other industries and issues to obscure the tobacco industry's role. The European "sound science" plans included a version of "good epidemiological practices" that would make it impossible to conclude that secondhand smoke-and thus other environmental toxins-caused diseases. Public health professionals need to be aware that the "sound science" movement is not an indigenous effort from within the profession to improve the quality of scientific discourse, but reflects sophisticated public relations campaigns controlled by industry executives and lawyers whose aim is to manipulate the standards of scientific proof to serve the corporate interests of their clients.
引用
收藏
页码:1749 / 1757
页数:9
相关论文
共 145 条
[1]  
*ADV SOUND SCI COA, 1993, INF SHEET DESCR TASS
[2]  
*ADV SOUND SCI COA, 1993, TABL CONT TASSC DIR
[3]  
ALBINUS S, 1994, SOUND SCI PROJECT EU
[4]  
*AM NONSM RIGHTS F, 1999, NAT SMOK ALL EXP
[5]  
ANDRADE A, 1993, ADV SOUND SCI COALIT
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1992, RESP HLTH EFF PASS S
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The cigarette papers
[8]  
[Anonymous], MED EC
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1996, PR NEWSWIRE 1203
[10]  
*ASS EP LANG FRANC, 1998, REC PROF STAND GOOD