Antidepressant efficacy of two different rTMS procedures -: High frequency over left versus low frequency over right prefrontal cortex compared with sham stimulation

被引:107
作者
Höppner, J
Schulz, M
Irmisch, G
Mau, R
Schläfke, D
Richter, J
机构
[1] Univ Rostock, Dept Psychiat & PSychotherapy, Ctr Nervous Dis, D-18147 Rostock, Germany
[2] Univ Rostock, Forens Psychiat Hosp, Rostock, Germany
关键词
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); depression; motor retardation; concentration; psychomotor speed;
D O I
10.1007/s00406-003-0416-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
investigate the influence of two different stimulation procedures of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on depressive symptoms in patients with depressive disorders. Furthermore, effects on cognitive functions and psychomotor functioning were tested. Methods Thirty patients with depression (22 females and 8 males; mean age of 56.4 years) were included. They were treated with a stable dosage of antidepressant medication. They received either high frequency rTMS (20 Hz) over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC), low frequency rTMS (1 Hz) over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC) or sham stimulations (10 patients in each group) as add on treatment at 10 days within 2 weeks. Depressive symptoms were registered by means of observer ratings (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - HDRS) and self reports (Beck Depression Inventory - BDI). Psychomotor retardation was investigated by the Motor Agitation and Retardation Scale and cognitive function by d2 test. Results and conclusions Differences between the rTMS procedures regarding depressive symptoms could not be found. Motor abnormalities, however, significantly improved exclusively after real stimulation procedures. Patients with less severe deficits in psychomotor speed and concentration responded more intensively than patients with severe deficits.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 109
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], KONZENTRATIONS LEIST
[2]   Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of medication-resistant depression: Preliminary data [J].
Avery, DH ;
Claypoole, K ;
Robinson, L ;
Neumaier, JF ;
Dunner, DL ;
Scheele, L ;
Wilson, L ;
Roy-Byrne, P .
JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE, 1999, 187 (02) :114-117
[3]  
BARKER AT, 1985, J PHYSIOL-LONDON, V369, pP3
[4]  
BAXTER LR, 1989, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V46, P243
[5]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING DEPRESSION [J].
BECK, AT ;
ERBAUGH, J ;
WARD, CH ;
MOCK, J ;
MENDELSOHN, M .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 1961, 4 (06) :561-&
[6]   TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - A POTENTIAL NEW FRONTIER IN PSYCHIATRY [J].
BELMAKER, RH ;
FLEISCHMANN, A .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 38 (07) :419-421
[7]   CHANGES IN REGIONAL CEREBRAL BLOOD-FLOW ON RECOVERY FROM DEPRESSION [J].
BENCH, CJ ;
FRACKOWIAK, RSJ ;
DOLAN, RJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 1995, 25 (02) :247-261
[8]   Facilitation of muscle evoked responses after repetitive cortical stimulation in man [J].
Berardelli, A ;
Inghilleri, M ;
Rothwell, JC ;
Romeo, S ;
Currà, A ;
Gilio, F ;
Modugno, N ;
Manfredi, M .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 122 (01) :79-84
[9]   A randomized clinical trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of major depression [J].
Berman, RM ;
Narasimhan, M ;
Sanacora, G ;
Miano, AP ;
Hoffman, RE ;
Hu, XS ;
Charney, DS ;
Boutros, NN .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2000, 47 (04) :332-337
[10]  
Brickenkamp R, 2002, TEST D2 AUFMERKSAMKE