Disk prediffusion is a reliable method for testing colistin susceptibility in porcine E. coli strains

被引:47
作者
Boyen, F. [1 ]
Vangroenweghe, F. [2 ]
Butaye, P. [1 ,3 ]
De Graef, E. [2 ]
Castryck, F. [2 ]
Heylen, P. [2 ]
Vanrobaeys, M. [2 ]
Haesebrouck, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Fac Vet Med, Dept Pathol Bacteriol & Avian Dis, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[2] Anim Hlth Care Flanders, B-8820 Torhout, Belgium
[3] Vet & Agrochem Res Ctr CODA CERVA, Dept Biocontrol, Sect Pathology, B-1180 Brussels, Ukkel, Belgium
关键词
Colistin; Prediffusion; Pigs; E-test; Escherichia coli; MIC; ANTIMICROBIAL RESISTANCE; DIFFUSION; ETEST; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.010
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
During the last few years, acquired resistance to colistin in Escherichia coli, but also in other bacterial species, has been reported. It has been shown that the disk diffusion test is not a reliable method for the detection of this resistance. Therefore, there is a need for a reliable and cheap test to determine colistin susceptibility of pathogenic E. coli strains. In the current research, the colistin susceptibility of E. coli isolated during the period 2005-2006 from pigs was determined. Results obtained with the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion test (Neosensitabs, Rosco), the disk prediffusion test (Neosensitabs, Rosco) and the E-test (AB Biodisk) were compared with the results of the reference agar dilution assay. The MIC values or inhibition zones showed a bimodal distribution for the results obtained by all test methods, except the disk diffusion assay, suggesting acquired resistance in 15 strains (9.6%). The E-test and disk prediffusion assay generated results within acceptable levels compared to the reference agar dilution assay. The categorical agreement with the results obtained by the agar dilution method were good to very good for all tests, except the disk diffusion assay. In conclusion, current results suggest that, in addition to the E-test, the disk prediffusion test is a reliable, alternative agar-based colistin susceptibility method for testing colistin susceptibility of E. coli isolates in diagnostic bacteriology. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 362
页数:4
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BERTSCHINGER HU, 1996, P 14 INT PIG VET SOC, P271
[2]  
Burch D. G. S., 2007, Pig Journal, V59, P91
[3]   A survey of group-level antibiotic prescriptions in pig production in France [J].
Chauvin, C ;
Beloeil, PA ;
Orand, JP ;
Sanders, P ;
Madec, F .
PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2002, 55 (02) :109-120
[4]  
Cunical and Laboratory Standards institute, 2008, M31A3 CLIN LAB STAND
[5]  
*EUR COMM ANT SUSC, 2009, MIC DISTR
[6]   Colistin susceptibility testing by Etest and disk diffusion methods [J].
Galani, Irene ;
Kontopidou, Flora ;
Souli, Maria ;
Rekatsina, Panagiota-Danai ;
Koratzanis, Evangelos ;
Deliolanis, John ;
Giamarellou, Helen .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2008, 31 (05) :434-439
[7]   Colistin and polymyxin B: A re-emergence [J].
Gupta, Sachin ;
Govil, Deepak ;
Kakar, Prem N. ;
Prakash, Om ;
Arora, Deep ;
Das, Shibani ;
Govil, Pradeep ;
Malhotra, Ashima .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 13 (02) :49-53
[8]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of pathogenic Escherichia coli isolated from sick cattle and pigs in Japan [J].
Harada, K ;
Asai, T ;
Kojima, A ;
Oda, C ;
Ishihara, K ;
Takahashi, T .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 67 (10) :999-1003
[9]   Quality control guidelines for testing gram-negative control strains with polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) by standardized methods [J].
Jones, RN ;
Anderegg, TR ;
Swenson, JM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 43 (02) :925-927
[10]   Detection of daptomycin-nonsusceptible strains using the Neo-Sensitab™ prediffusion method [J].
Katz, Bradley D. ;
Luperchio, Steven A. ;
Thorne, Grace M. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 61 (03) :315-320