Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection

被引:406
作者
Kahraman, C [1 ]
Ruan, D
Dogan, I
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-80680 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] CEN SCK, Belgian Nucl Res Ctr, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
关键词
facility location; fuzzy sets; synthetic evaluation; weighted goals; group decision; AHP;
D O I
10.1016/S0020-0255(03)00183-X
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The selection of a facility location among alternative locations is a multicriteria decision-making problem including both quantitative and qualitative criteria. The conventional approaches to facility location problem tend to be less effective in dealing with the imprecise or vagueness nature of the linguistic assessment. Under many situations, the values of the qualitative criteria are often imprecisely defined for the decision-makers. The aim of the paper is to solve facility location problems using different solution approaches of fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making. The paper includes four different fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making approaches. The first one is a fuzzy model of group decision proposed by Blin. The second is the fuzzy synthetic evaluation. The third is Yager's weighted goals method and the last one is fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Although four approaches have the same objective of selecting the best facility location alternative, they come from different theoretic backgrounds and relate differently to the discipline of multi-attribute group decision-making. These approaches are extended to select the best facility location alternative by taking into account quantitative and qualitative criteria. A short comparative analysis among the approaches and a numeric example to each approach are given. (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 153
页数:19
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, COMPUTER OPERATIONS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, P INT ICSC S ENG INT
[3]   Combining the analytic hierarchy process and goal programming for global facility location-allocation problem [J].
Badri, MA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 1999, 62 (03) :237-248
[4]   A fuzzy compromise approach to water resource systems planning under uncertainty [J].
Bender, MJ ;
Simonovic, SP .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2000, 115 (01) :35-44
[5]  
BENJAMIN CO, 1995, COMPUT IND ENG, V28, P43, DOI 10.1016/0360-8352(94)00021-E
[6]   Location of facilities on a network with groups of demand points [J].
Berman, O ;
Drezner, Z ;
Wesolowsky, GO .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2001, 33 (08) :637-648
[7]  
Bezdek J. C., 1979, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V2, P5, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(79)90011-3
[8]  
Bezdek J. C., 1978, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, V1, P255, DOI 10.1016/0165-0114(78)90017-9
[9]  
Blin J. M., 1973, Journal of Cybernetics, V3, P28, DOI 10.1080/01969727308545911
[10]  
Blin J. M., 1974, Journal of Cybernetics, V4, P17, DOI 10.1080/01969727408546063