Effects of diet and live weight at slaughter on kid meat quality

被引:65
作者
Argüello, A
Castro, N
Capote, J
Solomon, M
机构
[1] Las Palmas Gran Canaria Univ, Fac Vet, Dept Anim Prod, Anim Prod Unit, Arucas 35416, Spain
[2] ICIA, San Cristobal la Laguna, Tenerife, Spain
[3] USDA, Agr Res Serv, Food Technol & Safety Lab, Beltsville, MD 20705 USA
关键词
meat quality; diet; live weight at slaughter; kids;
D O I
10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.12.009
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 [食品科学与工程];
摘要
Forty male twin kids of the Majorera breed were used in a 2 x 2 design, in which the diet, suckled on dam (SD) or milk replacer (MR) and live weight at slaughter (6 or 10 kg) were the main variables. Muscle pH and colour (CIE, L*a*b*) were determined in the longissimus (LD), semimembranosus (SM) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles, immediately after slaughter and chilling (24 h). Water-holding capacity, shear force, chemical composition (moisture, fat, protein and collagen content and solubility) were determined. Muscle fibre populations were alsostudied. SD kid meat was slightly more tender and juicy, and the Chroma value was lower than in MR animals. The meat from the kids that were slaughtered at 10 kg was significantly darker in all muscles tested and slightly less tender 6 kg LWS kid meat had more moisture and less protein than that of 10 kg LWS kids. Muscle fibre area was statistically higher in the 10-kg LWS kids. It was concluded that the meat quality of the heavier kids was not significantly different from that of the lighter kids and that slaughter at the greater weight would result in more meat being marketed. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 179
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]
*AOAC, 1984, OFF METH AN
[2]
Passive transfer of immunity in kid goats fed refrigerated and frozen goat colostrum and commercial sheep colostrum [J].
Argüello, A ;
Castro, N ;
Zamorano, MJ ;
Castroalonso, A ;
Capote, J .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2004, 54 (03) :237-241
[3]
Limb myosin heavy chain isoproteins and muscle fiber types in the adult goat (Capra hircus) [J].
Argüello, A ;
López-Fernández, JL ;
Rivero, JLL .
ANATOMICAL RECORD, 2001, 264 (03) :284-293
[4]
CHEMICAL-COMPOSITION AND QUALITY ATTRIBUTES OF GOAT MEAT AND LAMB [J].
BABIKER, SA ;
ELKHIDER, IA ;
SHAFIE, SA .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1990, 28 (04) :273-277
[5]
MUSCLE FIBER TYPES - HOW MANY AND WHAT KIND [J].
BROOKE, MH ;
KAISER, KK .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 1970, 23 (04) :369-&
[6]
Morphological variability in the Canary goat population [J].
Capote, J ;
Delgado, JV ;
Fresno, M ;
Camacho, ME ;
Molina, A .
SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 1998, 27 (02) :167-172
[7]
Chilliard Y, 1981, NUTR SYSTEMS GOAT FE, P90
[8]
STANDARD METHODS AND PROCEDURES FOR GOAT CARCASS EVALUATION, JOINTING AND TISSUE SEPARATION [J].
COLOMERROCHER, F ;
MORANDFEHR, P ;
KIRTON, AH .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1987, 17 (02) :149-159
[9]
THE RELATIONSHIP OF MUSCLE-FIBER SIZE TO TENDERNESS OF BEEF [J].
CROUSE, JD ;
KOOHMARAIE, M ;
SEIDEMAN, SD .
MEAT SCIENCE, 1991, 30 (04) :295-302
[10]
Fresno M. R., 1994, Archivos de Zootecnia, V43, P181