Detection of marijuana use by oral fluid and urine analysis following single-dose administration of smoked and oral marijuana

被引:156
作者
Niedbala, RS
Kardos, KW
Fritch, DF
Kardos, S
Fries, T
Waga, J
Robb, J
Cone, EJ
机构
[1] OraSure Technol Inc, Bethlehem, PA 18015 USA
[2] LabOne Inc, Lenexa, KS USA
[3] ConeChem Res LLC, Severna Pk, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jat/25.5.289
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We compared oral fluid testing to urine testing in subjects who were administered single doses of marijuana by smoked and oral routes. Oral fluid specimens were collected with the Intercept™ DOA Oral Specimen Collection Device, screened for THC with the Cannabinoids Intercept MICRO-PLATE Enzyme Immunoassay (EIA) utilizing a 1.0-ng/mL cutoff concentration, and confirmed for THC by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS-MS) with a 0.5-ng/mL cutoff concentration. Urine specimens were screened for 11-nor-carboxy-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH) by immunoassay utilizing a 50-ng/mL cutoff concentration and confirmed for THCCOOH by GC-MS with a 15-ng/mL cutoff concentration. Oral fluid specimens tested positive following smoked marijuana (N = 10) consecutively for average periods (± SEM; range) of 15 (± 2; 1-24) and 13 h (± 3; 1-24) by EIA and GC-MS-MS, respectively. The average THC detection times of the last oral fluid positive specimen following smoked marijuana by EIA and GC-MS-MS were 31 (± 9; 1-72) and 34 h (± 11; 1-72), respectively. In comparison to oral fluid, urine specimens generally tested negative for THCCOOH immediately after marijuana use. The average times to detection of the first urine specimen positive for THCCOOH by EIA and GC-MS were 6 (± 2; 1-16) and 4 h (± 1; 2-8), respectively. Urine specimens tested positive consecutively for average periods of 26 (± 9; 2-72) and 33 h (± 10; 4-72) for EIA and GC-MS, respectively. The average THCCOOH detection times of the last specimen by EIA and GC-MS were 42 (± 10; 2-72) and 58 h (± 6; 16-72), respectively. Considering the non-invasive nature of oral fluid collection and improved detection of recent marijuana use compared to urine testing, it was concluded that oral fluid testing for THC offers specific advantages over other means of marijuana testing when used in safety-sensitive testing programs.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 303
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BRANDTZAEG P, 1977, BORDERLAND CARIES PE, P145
[2]  
CHALLACOMBE SJ, 1978, IMMUNOLOGY, V35, P923
[3]  
CONE EJ, IN PRESS FORENSIC SC
[4]   METHODS FOR ASSESSING DRUG-USE PREVALENCE IN THE WORKPLACE - A COMPARISON OF SELF-REPORT, URINALYSIS, AND HAIR ANALYSIS [J].
COOK, RF ;
BERNSTEIN, AD ;
ARRINGTON, TL ;
ANDREWS, CM ;
MARSHALL, GA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ADDICTIONS, 1995, 30 (04) :403-426
[5]  
DEKKER M, 1996, ORAL MUCOSAL DRUG DE, P248
[6]   EXCRETION PATTERNS OF CANNABINOID METABOLITES AFTER LAST USE IN A GROUP OF CHRONIC USERS [J].
ELLIS, GM ;
MANN, MA ;
JUDSON, BA ;
SCHRAMM, NT ;
TASHCHIAN, A .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1985, 38 (05) :572-578
[7]   DRUGS-OF-ABUSE TESTING IN URINE - STATISTICAL APPROACH AND EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF IMMUNOCHEMICAL AND CHROMATOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES [J].
FERRARA, SD ;
TEDESCHI, L ;
FRISON, G ;
BRUSINI, G ;
CASTAGNA, F ;
BERNARDELLI, B ;
SOREGAROLI, D .
JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1994, 18 (05) :278-291
[8]  
HARVEY DJ, 1984, REV BIOCHEM TOXICOL, V6, P221
[9]  
Hawks R. L., 1983, CANNABINOIDS CHEM PH, P1
[10]  
HEISHMAN SJ, 1998, HDB DRUG ABUSE, P206