Cigarette smoking and lung cancer - Modeling effect modification of total exposure and intensity

被引:72
作者
Lubin, Jay H.
Caporaso, Neil
Wichmann, H. Erich
Schaffrath-Rosario, Angelika
Alavanja, Michael C. R.
机构
[1] NCI, Biostat Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Rockville, MD 20852 USA
[2] NCI, Genet Epidemiol Branch, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Rockville, MD USA
[3] GSF, Natl Res Ctr Environm & Hlth, Neuherberg, Germany
[4] Abt Epidemiol & Gesundheitsberichterstattung, Robert Koch Inst, Berlin, Germany
[5] NCI, Div Canc Epidemiol & Genet, Occupat & Environm Epidemiol Branch, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/EDE.0b013e31812717fe
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: A recent analysis indicates that the excess odds ratio for lung cancer by smoking is described by a function that is linear in pack-years and exponential in the logarithm of smoking intensity and its square (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:517i, s i, 52 he model suggests that below 15-20 cigarettes per day there a direct exposure rate" effect, ie, the excess odds ratio per pack-year for higher intensity (and shorter duration) smokers is greater than for lower-intensity (and longer duration) smokers. Above 20 cigarettes per day, there is an "inverse-exposure-rate" effect, ie, the excess odds ratio per pack-year for higher intensity smokers is smaller than for lower-intensity smokers. Methods: Using pooled data from 2 large case-control studies of lung cancer (the European Smoking and Health Study and the German Radon Study), we evaluated effect modification of the association between smoking and lung cancer. Results: Interaction effects are very specific. Variations in risk of lung cancer with years since cessation of smoking, age, method of inhalation, and type of cigarette result from interactions with smoking intensity, and not total pack-years. In contrast, risk variations by sex result from the interaction with total pack-years, while intensity effects are homogeneous. Risk variations by age at which smoking started result from interactions with both total pack-years and intensity. All intensity interactions are homogeneous across studies. Conclusions: The specificity of the interactions may provide clues for the molecular basis of the smoking and lung cancer relationship.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 648
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Anderson KE, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P1544
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, HLTH CONS SMOK REP S
[3]   Lung cancer rates in men and women with comparable histories of smoking [J].
Bain, C ;
Feskanich, D ;
Speizer, FE ;
Thun, M ;
Hertzmark, E ;
Rosner, BA ;
Colditz, GA .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (11) :826-834
[4]   Cotinine concentration in smokers from different countries:: Relationship with amount smoked and cigarette type [J].
Blackford, Amanda L. ;
Yang, Gonghuan ;
Hernandez-Avila, Mauricio ;
Przewozniak, Krzysztof ;
Zatonski, Witold ;
Figueiredo, Valeska ;
Avila-Tang, Erika ;
Ma, Jiemin ;
Benowitz, Neal L. ;
Samet, Jonathan M. .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2006, 15 (10) :1799-1804
[5]   Recent trends and future directions for lung cancer mortality in Europe [J].
Brennan, P ;
Bray, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 87 (01) :43-48
[6]   Determinants of salivary cotinine levels among current smokers in Mexico [J].
Campuzano, JC ;
Hernandez-Avila, M ;
Jaakkola, MS ;
Ponce, EL ;
Morales, PK ;
Bautista, P ;
Benowitz, NL ;
Ceraso, M ;
Blackford, A ;
Samet, JM .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2004, 6 (06) :997-1008
[7]  
CARMELLA SG, 1995, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V4, P635
[8]   Measurement of self reported active exposure to cigarette smoke [J].
Etter, JF ;
Perneger, TV .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (09) :674-680
[9]   Effects of N-acetyl transferase 1 and 2 polymorphisms on bladder cancer risk in Caucasians [J].
Gu, J ;
Liang, D ;
Wang, YF ;
Lu, C ;
Wu, XF .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2005, 581 (1-2) :97-104
[10]   Women's susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens [J].
Henschke, CI ;
Miettinen, OS .
LUNG CANCER, 2004, 43 (01) :1-5