Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain:: systematic review

被引:608
作者
Guzmán, J
Esmail, R
Karjalainen, K
Malmivaara, A
Irvin, E
Bombardier, C
机构
[1] Inst Work & Hlth, Toronto, ON M4W 1E6, Canada
[2] Finnish Inst Occupat Hlth, Helsinki 00250, Finland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2001年 / 322卷 / 7301期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1511
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the effect of multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation on clinically relevant outcomes in patients with chronic low back pain. Design Systematic literature review of randomised controlled trials. Participants A total of 1964 patients with disabling low back pain for more than three months. Main outcome measures Pain, function, employment, quality of life, and global assessments. Results Ten trials reported on a total of 12 randomised comparisons of multidisciplinary treatment and a control condition. There was strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration improves function when compared with inpatient or outpatient non-multidisciplinary treatments. There was moderate evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration reduces pain when compared without patient non-multidisciplinary rehabilitation or usual care. There was contradictory evidence regarding vocational outcomes of intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial intervention. Some trials reported improvements in work readiness, but others showed no significant reduction in sickness leaves. Less intensive outpatient psychophysical treatments did not improve pain, function, or vocational outcomes when compared with non-multidisciplinary outpatient therapy or usual care. Few trials reported effects on quality of life or global assessments. Conclusions The reviewed trials provide evidence that intensive multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation with functional restoration reduces pain and improves function in patients with chronic low back pain. Less intensive interventions did not show improvements in clinically relevant outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1516
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF AN ADVANCED BACK PAIN REHABILITATION PROGRAM [J].
ABERG, J .
SPINE, 1984, 9 (03) :317-318
[2]   INTENSIVE PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL TRAINING-PROGRAM FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN - A CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL [J].
ALARANTA, H ;
RYTOKOSKI, U ;
RISSANEN, A ;
TALO, S ;
RONNEMAA, T ;
PUUKKA, P ;
KARPPI, SL ;
VIDEMAN, T ;
KALLIO, V ;
SLATIS, P .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (12) :1339-1349
[3]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[4]  
BADLEY EM, 1994, J RHEUMATOL, V21, P505
[5]   The promise and problems of meta-analysis [J].
Bailar, JC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (08) :559-561
[6]   Incorporation of cognitive-behavioral treatment into the medical care of chronic low back patients: A controlled randomized study in German pain treatment centers [J].
Basler, HD ;
Jakle, C ;
KronerHerwig, B .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1997, 31 (02) :113-124
[7]   A prospective, randomized 5-year follow-up study of functional restoration in chronic low back pain patients [J].
Bendix A.F. ;
Bendix T. ;
Hæstrup C. ;
Busch E. .
European Spine Journal, 1998, 7 (2) :111-119
[8]  
Bendix A F, 1995, Eur Spine J, V4, P148, DOI 10.1007/BF00298239
[9]   Multidisciplinary intensive treatment for chronic low back pain: A randomized, prospective study [J].
Bendix, AF ;
Bendix, T ;
Vaegter, K ;
Lund, C ;
Frolund, L ;
Holm, L .
CLEVELAND CLINIC JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 63 (01) :62-69
[10]  
Bendix AF, 1997, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V29, P81