The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size

被引:1470
作者
Rusbult, CE
Martz, JM
Agnew, CR
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Psychol, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Three studies evaluated the reliability and validity of the Investment Model Scale, an instrument designed to measure four constructs, including commitment level and three bases of dependence-satisfaction level, quality of alternatives and investment size. In all three studies, reliability analyses revealed good internal consistency among items designed to measure each construct. Also, principal components analyses performed on scale items revealed evidence of four factors, with items designed to measure each construct loading on independent factors. Studies 2 and 3 examined associations of model variables with instruments measuring diverse qualities of relationships and assorted personal dispositions. As anticipated, Investment Model variables were moderately associated with other measures reflecting superior couple functioning (e.g., dyadic adjustment, trust level, inclusion of other in the self), and were essentially unrelated to measures assessing personal dispositions (e.g., need for cognition, self-esteem). In addition, Study 3 demonstrated that earlier measures of Investment Model variables predicted later levels of dyadic adjustment and later relationship status (persisted vs. ended). It is hoped that the existence of a reliable and valid Investment Model Scale will promote further research regarding commitment and interdependence in ongoing close relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 391
页数:35
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]   Cognitive interdependence: Commitment and the mental representation of close relationships [J].
Agnew, CR ;
Van Lange, PAM ;
Rusbult, CE ;
Langston, CA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 74 (04) :939-954
[2]  
[Anonymous], READINGS SOCIAL PSYC
[3]   INCLUSION OF OTHER IN THE SELF SCALE AND THE STRUCTURE OF INTERPERSONAL CLOSENESS [J].
ARON, A ;
ARON, EN ;
SMOLLAN, D .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (04) :596-612
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   NOTES ON THE CONCEPT OF COMMITMENT [J].
BECKER, HS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1960, 66 (01) :32-40
[6]   INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BERSCHEID, E .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 45 :79-129
[7]   THE RELATIONSHIP CLOSENESS INVENTORY - ASSESSING THE CLOSENESS OF INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS [J].
BERSCHEID, E ;
SNYDER, M ;
OMOTO, AM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 57 (05) :792-807
[8]  
Berscheid E., 1998, HDB SOCIAL PSYCHOL, P193
[9]  
BRICKMAN P, 1987, COMMITMENT CONFLICT, P145
[10]   Testing the Rusbult model of relationship commitment and stability in a 15-year study of heterosexual couples [J].
Bui, KVT ;
Peplau, LA ;
Hill, CT .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1996, 22 (12) :1244-1257