Paclitaxel-based three-drug combinations for the treatment of small cell lung cancer: A review of the Sarah Cannon Cancer Center Experience

被引:8
作者
Hainsworth, JD [1 ]
Burris, HA [1 ]
Greco, FA [1 ]
机构
[1] Sarah Cannon Canc Ctr, Nashville, TN 37203 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1053/sonc.2001.25748
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Between June 1993 and September 1999, 217 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered three sequential phase II trials evaluating novel paclitaxel-containing three-drug combination chemotherapy regimens. Patients with limited- or extensive-stage SCLC, no previous treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2 were eligible. Trials 1 and 2 evaluated the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and etoposide; in the second trial, doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin were higher than in the first trial. Trial 3 evaluated the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and topotecan. Patients with limited-stage disease received radiation therapy to the primary tumor site and mediastinum, beginning concurrently with the third course of chemotherapy. All patients received four courses of chemotherapy, administered at 21-day intervals. All three regimens were highly active and produced high response rates in both limited- and extensive-stage SCLC. Median survivals for regimens 1, 2, and 3 in extensive-stage patients were 8, 10, and 8.5 months, respectively. Median survivals in limited-stage disease were 16, 20, and 15 months, respectively. Although definitive comparisons of these regimens cannot be made on the basis of sequential trials, the higher-dose paclitaxel/carboplatin/etoposide regimen seemed superior; with this regimen, 4-year survival in limited-stage disease was 23%. Paclitaxel-containing three-drug regimens, as evaluated in these three phase II trials, were feasible and highly active in the first-line treatment of SCLC. Randomized trials will be necessary to definitively evaluate the efficacy of these regimens as compared with traditional platinum/etoposide combinations. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BIRCH R, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA490
[2]   CARBOPLATIN DOSAGE - PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF A SIMPLE FORMULA BASED ON RENAL-FUNCTION [J].
CALVERT, AH ;
NEWELL, DR ;
GUMBRELL, LA ;
OREILLY, S ;
BURNELL, M ;
BOXALL, FE ;
SIDDIK, ZH ;
JUDSON, IR ;
GORE, ME ;
WILTSHAW, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (11) :1748-1756
[3]   GEMCITABINE IS AN ACTIVE NEW AGENT IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED EXTENSIVE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER (SCLC) - A STUDY OF THE NATIONAL-CANCER-INSTITUTE-OF-CANADA CLINICAL-TRIALS GROUP [J].
CORMIER, Y ;
EISENHAUER, E ;
MULDAL, A ;
GREGG, R ;
AYOUB, J ;
GOSS, G ;
STEWART, D ;
TARASOFF, P ;
WONG, D .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1994, 5 (03) :283-285
[4]   PHASE-II STUDY OF PACLITAXEL IN PATIENTS WITH EXTENSIVE-DISEASE SMALL-CELL LUNG-CANCER - AN EASTERN-COOPERATIVE-ONCOLOGY-GROUP STUDY [J].
ETTINGER, DS ;
FINKELSTEIN, DM ;
SARMA, RP ;
JOHNSON, DH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (06) :1430-1435
[5]  
GATZEMEIER U, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA483
[6]   Cisplatin, etoposide, and paclitaxel in the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung carcinoma [J].
Glisson, BS ;
Kurie, JM ;
Perez-Soler, R ;
Fox, NJ ;
Murphy, WK ;
Fossella, FV ;
Lee, JS ;
Ross, MB ;
Nyberg, DA ;
Pisters, KMW ;
Shin, DM ;
Hong, WK .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (08) :2309-2315
[7]  
GRAY JR, 2000, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V19, pA494
[8]   Paclitaxel, carboplatin, and extended-schedule etoposide in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer: Comparison of sequential phase II trials using different dose-intensities [J].
Hainsworth, JD ;
Gray, JR ;
Stroup, SL ;
Kalman, LA ;
Patten, JE ;
Hopkins, LG ;
Thomas, M ;
Greco, FA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (12) :3464-3470
[9]  
Hainsworth JD, 1999, CANCER, V85, P1179, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1179::AID-CNCR23>3.3.CO
[10]  
2-9