Paraspinal muscle vibration alters dynamic motion of the trunk

被引:11
作者
Arashanapalli, M. [1 ]
Wilson, S. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Mech Engn, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2008年 / 130卷 / 02期
关键词
lumbar spine; vibration; proprioception; stability;
D O I
10.1115/1.2898734
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 [生物物理学];
摘要
Loss in dynamic stability of the low back has been identified as a potential factor in the etiology of low back injuries. A number of factors are important in the ability of a person to. maintain an upright trunk posture including the preparatory stiffness of the trunk and the magnitude and timing of the neuromotor response. A neuromotor response requires appropriate sensing of joint motion. In this research, the role of this sensory ability in dynamic performance of the trunk was examined using a simple pendulum model of the trunk with neuromotor,feedback. An increased sensory threshold was found to lead to increased torso flexion and increased delay in neuromotor response. This was confirmed experimentally using paraspinal muscle vibration which is known to alter proprioception of the muscle spindle organs. Before, during and after exposure to bilateral, paraspinal muscle vibration for 20 minutes, the dynamic response of subjects to an unexpected torso flexion load was examined. Subjects were found to have a 19.5% slower time to peak muscle activity and a 16.1% greater torso flexion during exposure to paraspinal muscle vibration. Torso flexion remained significantly increased after vibration exposure relative to before exposure. These results suggest that the neuromotor response plays an important role in trunk dynamics. Loss in sensitivity of the sensory system can have a detrimental effect on trunk dynamics, increasing delays in neuromotor response and increasing the motion of the trunk in response to an unexpected load.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]
Estimating three-dimensional spinal repositioning error: The impact of range, posture, and number of trials [J].
Allison, GT ;
Fukushima, S .
SPINE, 2003, 28 (22) :2510-2516
[2]
EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS ON LOW-BACK-PAIN IN INDUSTRY [J].
ANDERSSON, GBJ .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (01) :53-60
[3]
[Anonymous], 2002, LOW BACK DISORDERS E
[4]
BACK INJURIES IN INDUSTRY - A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY .2. INJURY FACTORS [J].
BIGOS, SJ ;
SPENGLER, DM ;
MARTIN, NA ;
ZEH, J ;
FISHER, L ;
NACHEMSON, A ;
WANG, MH .
SPINE, 1986, 11 (03) :246-251
[5]
Effect of paraspinal muscle vibration on position sense of the lumbosacral spine [J].
Brumagne, S ;
Lysens, R ;
Swinnen, S ;
Verschueren, S .
SPINE, 1999, 24 (13) :1328-1331
[6]
The role of paraspinal muscle spindles in lumbosacral position sense in individuals with and without low back pain [J].
Brumagne, S ;
Cordo, P ;
Lysens, R ;
Verschueren, S ;
Swinnen, S .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (08) :989-994
[7]
DEMOGRAPHIC-FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PREVALENCE OF DISABILITY IN THE GENERAL-POPULATION - ANALYSIS OF THE NHANES-I DATABASE [J].
CATSBARIL, WL ;
FRYMOYER, JW .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (06) :671-674
[8]
CHOLEWICKI J, 1991, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, V23, P1179
[9]
Effects of external trunk loads on lumbar spine stability [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
Simons, APD ;
Radebold, A .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (11) :1377-1385
[10]
Delayed trunk muscle reflex responses increase the risk of low back injuries [J].
Cholewicki, J ;
Silfies, SP ;
Shah, RA ;
Greene, HS ;
Reeves, NP ;
Alvi, K ;
Goldberg, B .
SPINE, 2005, 30 (23) :2614-2620