Electronic chart review as an aid to postdischarge surgical site surveillance: Increased case finding

被引:23
作者
Friedman, C
Sturm, LK
Chenoweth, C
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Infect Control & Epidemiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Infect Dis, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mic.2001.114401
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: At the University of Michigan Hospitals and Health Centers, there is increasing use of an electronic medical record. Because orthopedic surgeons dictate all outpatient visits to the patient's electronic record, total knee arthroplasties were chosen to determine whether the use of electronic medical records increased case finding. Methods: All patients who underwent a total knee arthroplasty during the study period (1996-1999) were followed prospectively with the use of the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System definitions. Traditional surveillance methods were used to ascertain infections. In addition, each patient's postdischarge outpatient clinic chart was reviewed electronically for I year after operation. Results: From 1996 to 1999, 555 procedures were performed. Overall, 25 infections were identified after operation. Seven infections were identified through traditional surveillance methods, which resulted in an average surgical site infection rate of 1.3%. The use of electronic chart review surveillance after discharge revealed a rate of 4.5%, which was significantly higher than traditional surveillance (P < .01). Eighteen of 25 infections (72%) would not have been identified with the use of traditional surveillance methods. Conclusion: Postdischarge electronic chart review enhanced case finding significantly, which resulted in a more accurate infection rate. Awareness should be given to the institutions' surveillance methods and intensity when comparing to published rates.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 332
页数:4
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] COMPARISON OF CASE-FINDING METHODOLOGIES FOR ENDOMETRITIS AFTER CESAREAN-SECTION
    BAKER, C
    LUCE, J
    CHENOWETH, C
    FRIEDMAN, C
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1995, 23 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [2] SURGICAL WOUND INFECTIONS DOCUMENTED AFTER HOSPITAL DISCHARGE
    BROWN, RB
    BRADLEY, S
    OPITZ, E
    CIPRIANI, D
    PIECZARKA, R
    SANDS, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1987, 15 (02) : 54 - 58
  • [3] POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTIONS DETECTED DURING HOSPITALIZATION AND AFTER DISCHARGE IN A COMMUNITY-HOSPITAL
    BURNS, SJ
    DIPPE, SE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 1982, 10 (02) : 60 - 65
  • [4] WOUND-INFECTION RATES - THE IMPORTANCE OF DEFINITION AND POSTDISCHARGE WOUND SURVEILLANCE
    BYRNE, DJ
    LYNCH, W
    NAPIER, A
    DAVEY, P
    MALEK, M
    CUSCHIERI, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1994, 26 (01) : 37 - 43
  • [5] Classen DC, 1995, INFECT CONT HOSP EP, V16, P729
  • [6] CRUSE PJE, 1980, SURG CLIN N AM, V60, P27
  • [7] SURGICAL WOUND-INFECTION RATES BY WOUND CLASS, OPERATIVE PROCEDURE, AND PATIENT RISK INDEX
    CULVER, DH
    HORAN, TC
    GAYNES, RP
    MARTONE, WJ
    JARVIS, WR
    EMORI, TG
    BANERJEE, SN
    EDWARDS, JR
    TOLSON, JS
    HENDERSON, TS
    HUGHES, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 91 : S152 - S157
  • [8] EVANS RS, 1992, AM J INFECT CONTROL, V20, P4
  • [9] Fanning C, 1995, Can J Infect Control, V10, P75
  • [10] National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System report, data summary from January 1992-April 2000, issued June 2000
    Gerberding, J
    Gaynes, R
    Horan, T
    Alonso-Echanove, J
    Edwards, J
    Emori, G
    Fridkin, S
    Hageman, J
    Henderson, T
    Lawton, R
    Peavy, G
    Richards, C
    Tolson, J
    Wages, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2000, 28 (06) : 429 - 448