In vitro, biomechanical comparison of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anteriorly placed, low-profile lumbar plate and posteriorly placed pedicle screws or translaminar screws

被引:91
作者
Beaubien, BP
Derincek, A
Lew, WD
Wood, KB
机构
[1] Minneapolis Med Res Fdn Inc, Orthopaed Biomech Lab, Minneapolis, MN USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
anterior lumbar interbody fusion; anterior lumbar plate; pedicle screws; translaminar screws;
D O I
10.1097/01.brs.0000174275.95104.12
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. An in vitro biomechanical comparison of anteriorly placed lumbar plates, pedicle screws, and translaminar screws in the anterior lumbar interbody fusion ( ALIF) setting. Objectives. To determine whether an anteriorly placed lumbar plate reduces the flexibility in terms of neutral zone and range of motion of a simulated ALIF, and to compare this reduction in flexibility to that provided by posteriorly placed pedicle screws and translaminar screws. Summary of Background Data. Pedicular and translaminar facet fixation add stability and increase fusion rates, compared with ALIF alone. An anteriorly placed lumbar plate has been introduced to provide stability without the need for a secondary approach. However, this plate has not been evaluated biomechanically. Methods. Seven intact, cadaveric lumbar motion segments were tested to +/- 7.5 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. Specimens were retested after ALIF, and after subsequent instrumentation with pedicle screws, translaminar screws, and anterior lumbar plates. The range of motion and neutral zone were measured from resulting flexibility curves. Results. Mean ( +/- standard deviation) flexion-extension range of motion for intact segments ( 9.9 degrees +/- 3.1 degrees) was significantly reduced to 7.7 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees after ALIF ( P = 0.02), and was further reduced to 3.0 +/- 0.9 with lumbar plates ( P < 0.001), 1.5 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees with pedicle screws ( P < 0.001), and 0.9 degrees +/- 0.4 degrees with translaminar screws ( P < 0.001). All 3 devices also reduced flexion-extension neutral zone and torsion neutral zone and range of motion, compared with ALIF alone ( P < 0.05). Lumbar plates did not decrease lateral bending range of motion or neutral zone ( P > 0.05), whereas pedicle and translaminar screws did ( P < 0.05). Conclusions. Although not as rigid as pedicle or translaminar screws, anterior lumbar plating does add significant stability to an ALIF and may provide a valuable, single-approach alternative to supplemental posterior fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:1846 / 1851
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Adams M S, 2001, Spine J, V1, P166, DOI 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00049-3
[2]
THE RELEVANCE OF TORSION TO THE MECHANICAL DERANGEMENT OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
ADAMS, MA ;
HUTTON, WC .
SPINE, 1981, 6 (03) :241-248
[3]
BAKER JK, 1990, SPINE, V15, P946
[4]
Posterior augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion -: Minimally invasive fixation versus pedicle screws in vitro [J].
Beaubien, BP ;
Mehbod, AA ;
Kallemeier, PM ;
Lew, WD ;
Buttermann, GR ;
Transfeldt, EE ;
Wood, KB .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (19) :E406-E412
[5]
Posterior lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage [J].
Brodke, DS ;
Dick, JC ;
Kunz, DN ;
McCabe, R ;
Zdeblick, TA .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (01) :26-31
[6]
Burns BH, 1933, LANCET, V1, P1233
[7]
CROCK HV, 1982, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V165, P157
[8]
DiAngelo DJ, 2002, ORTHOPEDICS, V25, pS1157
[9]
DUNN HK, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V189, P116
[10]
COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE TECHNIQUE OF PEDICLE SCREW FIXATION - A SELECTED SURVEY OF ABS MEMBERS [J].
ESSES, SI ;
SACHS, BL ;
DREYZIN, V .
SPINE, 1993, 18 (15) :2231-2239