In-well hydraulics of the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter

被引:20
作者
Dinwiddie, CL [1 ]
Foley, NA [1 ]
Molz, FJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Dept Environm Engn & Sci, Anderson, SC 29625 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00988.x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Previous studies have suggested that head losses associated with the application of the electromagnetic borehole flowmeter (EBF) can have important and detrimental effects on the use of the instrument for measurement of hydraulic conductivity (K) profiles. Head losses associated with now through the meter may cause bypass flow around the packer if the well is gravel packed. In any type of well, changing head losses with meter position can cause changes in flow into the well that are not related directly to the K distribution. Such flow changes, or redistribution, can cause errors in the calculation of the K profile. Numerical simulations, based on measured head losses, indicate that bypass now in gravel packed systems increases with increasing flow rate through the meter, increasing gravel pack conductivity, and increasing gravel pack thickness. Ideally, the EBF should not be used in gravel packed wells, due to the occurrence of bypass flow. Investigations into the flow redistribution phenomenon indicate that the top portion of the aquifer is where the greatest overestimation of K occurs. The portion of the well below the flowmeter is isolated from the observed drawdown as measured from the surface. In this region, the well experiences a reduced drawdown, which differs from the observed drawdown by an amount equal to the head loss at that meter position. Flow redistribution causes a more pronounced effect in more highly conductive mediums and may be almost negligible in mediums of low conductivity.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 315
页数:11
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ARNOLD KB, 1997, THESIS CLEMSON U
[2]   Borehole flowmeter application in fluvial sediments: Methodology, results, and assessment [J].
Boman, GK ;
Molz, FJ ;
Boone, KD .
GROUND WATER, 1997, 35 (03) :443-450
[3]  
DINWIDDIE CL, 1997, THESIS CLEMSON U AND
[4]  
Driscoll F., 1986, GROUNDWATER WELLS
[5]  
FOLEY NA, 1997, THESIS CLEMSON U
[6]  
Hornbeck R. W., 1975, NUMERICAL METHODS
[7]  
Molz F.J., 1993, LOG ANAL, V3, P13
[8]   THE IMPELLER METER FOR MEASURING AQUIFER PERMEABILITY VARIATIONS - EVALUATION AND COMPARISON WITH OTHER TESTS [J].
MOLZ, FJ ;
MORIN, RH ;
HESS, AE ;
MELVILLE, JG ;
GUVEN, O .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1989, 25 (07) :1677-1683
[9]   SIMULATION OF CYLINDRICAL FLOW TO A WELL USING THE UNITED-STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MODULAR FINITE-DIFFERENCE GROUNDWATER-FLOW MODEL [J].
REILLY, TE ;
HARBAUGH, AW .
GROUND WATER, 1993, 31 (03) :489-494