Effect of electronic secondary markets on the supply chain

被引:51
作者
Ghose, A [1 ]
Telang, R
Krishnan, R
机构
[1] NYU, Leonard N Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, John Heinz III Sch Publ Policy & Management, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
electronic markets; information goods; market segmentation; quality degradation; supply chain; used goods markets;
D O I
10.1080/07421222.2005.11045853
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We present a model to investigate the competitive implications of electronic secondary markets that promote concurrent selling of new and used goods on a supply chain. In secondary markets where suppliers cannot directly utilize used goods for practicing intertemporal price discrimination and where transaction costs of resales are negligible, the threat of cannibalization of new goods by used goods becomes significant. We examine conditions under which it is optimal for suppliers to operate in such markets, explaining why these markets may not always be detrimental for them. Intuitively, secondary markets provide an active outlet for some high-valuation consumers to sell their used goods. The potential for such resales leads to an increase in consumers' valuation for a new good, leading them to buy an additional new good. Given sufficient heterogeneity in consumers' affinity across multiple suppliers' products, the "market expansion effect" accruing from consumers' cross-product purchase affinity can mitigate the losses incurred by suppliers from the direct "cannibalization effect." We also highlight the strategic role that the used goods commission set by the retailer plays in determining profits for suppliers. We conclude the paper by empirically testing some implications of our model using a unique data set from the online book industry, which has a flourishing secondary market.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 120
页数:30
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   PRICE-DISCRIMINATION VIA 2ND-HAND MARKETS [J].
ANDERSON, SP ;
GINSBURG, VA .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 38 (01) :23-44
[2]  
ARON R, 1998, DECIS SUPPORT SYST, V24, P3
[3]   Reducing buyer search costs: Implications for electronic marketplaces [J].
Bakos, JY .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (12) :1676-1692
[4]   INTERRELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MARKETS FOR NEW AND USED DURABLE GOODS [J].
BENJAMIN, DK ;
KORMENDI, RC .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1974, 17 (02) :381-401
[5]   DURABLE GOOD MONOPOLIES WITH RATIONAL-EXPECTATIONS AND REPLACEMENT SALES [J].
BOND, EW ;
SAMUELSON, L .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1984, 15 (03) :336-345
[6]   DURABLE-GOODS MONOPOLISTS [J].
BULOW, JI .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1982, 90 (02) :314-332
[7]  
Cachon G.P., 2003, HDB OPERATIONS RES M, P1
[8]   DURABILITY AND MONOPOLY [J].
COASE, RH .
JOURNAL OF LAW & ECONOMICS, 1972, 15 (01) :143-149
[9]   Leasing and selling: Optimal marketing strategies for a durable goods firm [J].
Desai, P ;
Purohit, D .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 44 (11) :S19-S34
[10]   ADVERSE SELECTION IN THE WHOLESALE USED CAR MARKET [J].
GENESOVE, D .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1993, 101 (04) :644-665