Responses of cool-season grain legumes and wheat to soil-applied zinc

被引:18
作者
Brennan, RF
Bolland, MDA
Siddique, KHM
机构
[1] Agr Western Australia, Albany, WA 6330, Australia
[2] Agr Western Australia, Bunbury, WA 6231, Australia
[3] Agr Western Australia, Bentley 6983, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Ctr Legumes Mediterranean Agr, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1081/PLN-100103666
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The yield and zinc (Zn) content response of faba bean (Vicia faba L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to applications of Zn fertilizer was compared in a glasshouse experiment using two alkaline soils from southwestern Australia. Comparative Zn requirements were determined from yields of 46-day-old dried shoots when no Zn fertilizer was applied the amount of Zn required to produce the same percentage of the maximum (relative) yield of dried shoots, and the Zn content of dried shoots (Zn concentration multiplied by yield of dried shoots). The concentration of Zn in youngest tissue and in dried shoots was used to determine critical concentrations for Zn in tissue. Faba bean used indigenous soil Zn more effectively than chickpea, followed by wheat and then lentil. The Zn requirement was lowest for faba bean, and increased in the order faba bean < chickpea < wheat < lentil. Zinc concentration in dried youngest tissue and in dried shoots increased with an increase in the amount of added Zn. The critical Zn concentration in the youngest tissue, associated with 90% of the relative yield, was (mg Zn kg(-1)): 25 for lentil, 18 for faba bean, 17 for chickpea and 12 for wheat; corresponding values for dried whole tops (mg Zn kg(-1)) were: 30 for lentil, 19 for faba bean, 17 for chickpea, and 20 for wheat. Information on comparative responses of the grain legumes to Zn additions relative to wheat, and critical tissue test values, will aid in the fertilizer management of Zn in cool-season grain legumes in the southwestern Australian farming systems.
引用
收藏
页码:727 / 741
页数:15
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   DETERMINATION OF ZINC IN AGRICULTURAL MATERIALS BY ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROPHTOMETRY [J].
ALLAN, JE .
ANALYST, 1961, 86 (102) :530-&
[2]  
BARROW N J, 1972, Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, V12, P502, DOI 10.1071/EA9720502
[3]   RESPONSE TO PHOSPHATE OF 2 ANNUAL PASTURE SPECIES .1. EFFECT OF SOILS ABILITY TO ADSORB PHOSPHATE ON COMPARATIVE PHOSPHATE REQUIREMENT [J].
BARROW, NJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 1975, 26 (01) :137-143
[4]   EQUATIONS FOR DESCRIBING SIGMOID YIELD RESPONSES AND THEIR APPLICATION TO SOME PHOSPHATE RESPONSES BY LUPINS AND BY SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER [J].
BARROW, NJ ;
MENDOZA, RE .
FERTILIZER RESEARCH, 1990, 22 (03) :181-188
[5]   DIAGNOSIS OF ZINC-DEFICIENCY IN PEANUT (ARACHIS-HYPOGAEA L) BY PLANT ANALYSIS [J].
BELL, RW ;
KIRK, G ;
PLASKETT, D ;
LONERGAN, JF .
COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 1990, 21 (3-4) :273-285
[6]   Comparing responses of grain legumes, wheat and canola to applications of superphosphate [J].
Bolland, MDA ;
Siddique, KHM ;
Loss, SP ;
Baker, MJ .
NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 1999, 53 (02) :157-175
[7]  
BRENNAN RF, 1986, 2186 DEP AGR FARM
[8]  
BRENNAN RF, 1993, ZINC SOIL PLANTS, P168
[9]  
COLWELL J. D., 1963, AUSTRALIAN JOUR EXPTL AGRIC AND ANIMAL HUSB, V3, P190, DOI 10.1071/EA9630190
[10]  
Day P.R., 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL 1, P562, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1.C43