Size, foraging, and food web structure

被引:397
作者
Petchey, Owen L. [1 ]
Beckerman, Andrew P. [1 ]
Riede, Jens O. [2 ]
Warren, Philip H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Anim & Plant Sci, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] Tech Univ Darmstadt, Dept Biol, D-64287 Darmstadt, Germany
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
body size; complexity; connectance;
D O I
10.1073/pnas.0710672105
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Understanding what structures ecological communities is vital to answering questions about extinctions, environmental change, trophic cascades, and ecosystem functioning. Optimal foraging theory was conceived to increase such understanding by providing a framework with which to predict species interactions and resulting community structure. Here, we use an optimal foraging model and allometries of foraging variables to predict the structure of real food webs. The qualitative structure of the resulting model provides a more mechanistic basis for the phenomenological rules of previous models. Quantitative analyses show that the model predicts up to 65% of the links in real food webs. The deterministic nature of the model allows analysis of the model's successes and failures in predicting particular interactions. Predacious and herbivorous feeding interactions are better predicted than pathogenic, parasitoid, and parasitic interactions. Results also indicate that accurate prediction and modeling of some food webs will require incorporating traits other than body size and diet choice models specific to different types of feeding interaction. The model results support the hypothesis that individual behavior, subject to natural selection, determines individual diets and that food web structure is the sum of these individual decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:4191 / 4196
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Prey-predator size-dependent functional response: derivation and rescaling to the real world [J].
Aljetlawi, AA ;
Sparrevik, E ;
Leonardsson, K .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2004, 73 (02) :239-252
[2]   Foraging biology predicts food web complexity [J].
Beckerman, Andrew P. ;
Petchey, Owen L. ;
Warren, Philip H. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (37) :13745-13749
[3]   HERBIVORE OPTIMAL FORAGING - A COMPARATIVE TEST OF 3 MODELS [J].
BELOVSKY, GE .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 124 (01) :97-115
[4]   DIETARY NICHE BREADTH IN A LOCAL-COMMUNITY OF PASSERINE BIRDS, AN ANALYSIS USING PHYLOGENETIC CONTRASTS [J].
BRANDL, R ;
KRISTIN, A ;
LEISLER, B .
OECOLOGIA, 1994, 98 (01) :109-116
[5]  
Brose U., 2005, ECOLOGY, V86, P2545, DOI [10.1890/05-0379, DOI 10.1890/05-0379]
[6]   CASCADING TROPHIC INTERACTIONS AND LAKE PRODUCTIVITY [J].
CARPENTER, SR ;
KITCHELL, JF ;
HODGSON, JR .
BIOSCIENCE, 1985, 35 (10) :634-639
[7]   Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structure [J].
Cattin, MF ;
Bersier, LF ;
Banasek-Richter, C ;
Baltensperger, R ;
Gabriel, JP .
NATURE, 2004, 427 (6977) :835-839
[8]  
Cohen J.E., 1990, Community Food Webs: Data and Theory
[9]   POPULATION-DENSITY AND BODY SIZE IN MAMMALS [J].
DAMUTH, J .
NATURE, 1981, 290 (5808) :699-700
[10]  
de Roos AM, 2002, ECOL MONOGR, V72, P271, DOI 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0271:ONSAFB]2.0.CO