Validation of an arsenic sequential extraction method for evaluating mobility in sediments

被引:483
作者
Keon, NE [1 ]
Swartz, CH [1 ]
Brabander, DJ [1 ]
Harvey, CF [1 ]
Hemond, HF [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Ralph M Parsons Lab, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es001511o
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Arsenic (As) mobility and transport in the environment are strongly influenced by arsenic's associations with solid phases in soil and sediment. We have tested a sequential extraction procedure intended to differentiate the following pools of solid phase arsenic: loosely and strongly adsorbed As; As coprecipitated with metal oxides or amorphous monosulfides; As coprecipitated with crystalline iron (oxyhydr)oxides; As oxides; As coprecipitated with pyrite; and As sulfides. Additions of As-bearing phases to wetland and riverbed sediment subsamples were quantitatively recovered by the following extractants of the sequential extraction procedure: As adsorbed on goethite, 1 M NaH(2)PO(4); arsenic trioxide (As(2)O(3)), 10 M HF; arsenopyrite (FeAsS), 16 N HNO(3); amorphous As sulfide, 1 N HCl, 50 mM Ti-citrate-EDTA, and 16 N HNO(3); and orpiment (As(2)S(3)), hot concentrated HNO(3)/H(2)O(2) Wet sediment subsamples from both highly contaminated wetland peat and less As-rich sandy riverbed sediment were used to test the extraction procedure for intra-method reproducibility. The proportional distribution of As among extractant pools was consistent for subsamples of the wetland and for subsamples of the riverbed sediments. In addition, intermethod variability between the sequential extraction procedure and a single-step hot concentrated HNO(3)/H(2)O(2) acid digestion was investigated. The sum of the As recovered in the different extractant pools was not significantly different than results for the acid digestion.
引用
收藏
页码:2778 / 2784
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Microbial mobilization of arsenic from sediments of the Aberjona Watershed [J].
Ahmann, D ;
Krumholz, LR ;
Hemond, HF ;
Lovley, DR ;
Morel, FMM .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (10) :2923-2930
[2]   CRYSTAL NUCLEATION IN FE(3) SOLUTIONS AND HYDRXIDE GELS [J].
ATKINSON, RJ ;
POSNER, AM ;
QUIRK, JP .
JOURNAL OF INORGANIC & NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 1968, 30 (09) :2371-+
[3]   SOURCES AND DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN THE ABERJONA WATERSHED, EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS [J].
AURILIO, AC ;
DURANT, JL ;
HEMOND, HF ;
KNOX, ML .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 81 (3-4) :265-282
[4]  
BHUMBLA DK, 1994, ADV ENVIRON SCI TECH, V26, P51
[5]  
Canfield D. E., 1988, Ph.D. dissertation
[6]   MATRIX INTERFERENCES IN ARSENIC DETERMINATIONS BY GRAPHITE-FURNACE ATOMIC-ABSORPTION SPECTROMETRY - RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF ARSENIC IN WATER SAMPLES [J].
CHAKRABORTI, D ;
IRGOLIC, KJ ;
ADAMS, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1984, 17 (3-4) :241-256
[7]   SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC DETERMINATION OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN NATURAL WATERS [J].
CLINE, JD .
LIMNOLOGY AND OCEANOGRAPHY, 1969, 14 (03) :454-&
[8]   Selective extraction chemistry of toxic metal sulfides from sediments [J].
Cooper, DC ;
Morse, JW .
AQUATIC GEOCHEMISTRY, 1999, 5 (01) :87-97
[9]   THE CHARACTERIZATION OF IRON SULFIDE MINERALS IN ANOXIC MARINE-SEDIMENTS [J].
CORNWELL, JC ;
MORSE, JW .
MARINE CHEMISTRY, 1987, 22 (2-4) :193-206
[10]   ARSENIC SPECIATION IN THE ENVIRONMENT [J].
CULLEN, WR ;
REIMER, KJ .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 1989, 89 (04) :713-764