Assessment of embryo viability in assisted reproductive technology: shortcomings of current approaches and the emerging role of metabolomics

被引:96
作者
Bromer, Jason G. [1 ]
Seli, Emre [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
assisted reproductive technology; embryo assessment; embryo metabolism; metabolomics; multiple pregnancies;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282fe723d
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review The present article describes the current status of embryo assessment in assisted reproductive technologies and discusses two important issues that derive, at least in part, from our inability to adequately assess the reproductive potential of individual embryos: low implantation rates and high multiple pregnancy rates. After an overview of studies evaluating embryo metabolism as a predictor of embryo viability, use of metabolomics and additional emerging approaches for rapid, noninvasive, embryo assessment are discussed. Recent findings Morphology and cleavage rate remain the mainstay of embryo assessment. A number of technologies are, however, under investigation. These include the assessment of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, and amino acid metabolism, proteomic profiling, evaluation of oxygen consumption, and most recently, examination of the metabolome. Summary As the number of assisted reproductive technology cycles increases worldwide, improvements in the ability to quickly and noninvasively determine the best embryos for transfer remain a critical goal for reproductive medicine. Recent studies suggest that metabolomic profiling of embryo culture media may provide a useful adjunct to the current embryo assessment strategies based on morphology and cleavage rate.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 241
页数:8
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]   The maternal and neonatal outcome of triplet gestations [J].
Albrecht, JL ;
Tomich, PG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (05) :1551-1556
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, PRETERM BIRTH CAUSES
[3]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN PREIMPLANTATIO
[4]   Variability in the difficulties experienced by women undergoing infertility treatments [J].
Benyamini, Y ;
Gozlan, M ;
Kokia, E .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) :275-283
[5]   PATTERN OF ENERGY METABOLISM IN MOUSE OOCYTE AND ZYGOTE [J].
BIGGERS, JD ;
WHITTING.DG ;
DONAHUE, RP .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1967, 58 (02) :560-&
[6]   Identification of viable embryos in IVF by non-invasive measurement of amino acid turnover [J].
Brison, DR ;
Houghton, FD ;
Falconer, D ;
Roberts, SA ;
Hawkhead, J ;
Humpherson, PG ;
Lieberman, BA ;
Leese, HJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (10) :2319-2324
[7]   COSTS OF TRIPLET PREGNANCY [J].
CHELMOW, D ;
PENZIAS, AS ;
KAUFMAN, G ;
CETRULO, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (02) :677-682
[8]  
CONAGHAN J, 1993, J REPROD FERTIL, V99, P87
[9]   SELECTION CRITERIA FOR HUMAN EMBRYO TRANSFER - A COMPARISON OF PYRUVATE UPTAKE AND MORPHOLOGY [J].
CONAGHAN, J ;
HARDY, K ;
HANDYSIDE, AH ;
WINSTON, RML ;
LEESE, HJ .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1993, 10 (01) :21-30
[10]  
EDWARDS R G, 1984, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V1, P3, DOI 10.1007/BF01129615