Methods for quantification of coronary artery calcifications with electron beam and conventional computed tomography

被引:15
作者
Becker, CR
Jakobs, T
Knez, A
Becker, A
Haberl, R
Brüning, R
Schoepf, UJ
Reiser, MF
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Inst Radiol Diagnostik, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Univ Munich, Klinikum Grosshadern, Abt Kardiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
来源
RADIOLOGE | 1998年 / 38卷 / 12期
关键词
electron beam CT; coronary calcification; coronary screening;
D O I
10.1007/s001170050455
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare electron beam CT (EBCT) und prospectively ECG gated conventional CT for the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcifications. Methods: 42 patients (mean age 62.8+/-8.8 yea rs) were scanned, both with EBCT a nd ECG gated sequential CT. For quantification, the traditional "total calcium score" (TCS) according to the Agatson method as well as the "volumetric calcium score" (VCS) as determined with a stand-alone workstation (NetraMD) was calculated for both modalities. Results: There was close correlation between EBCT and conventional CT,both for TCS (r=0.984) as well as for VCS (r=0.986) score values. The median difference was 17% for TCS and 13% for VCS the difference between the two modalities was not statistically significant (p=0.44). Conclusion: EBCT and prospectively ECC triggered conventional CT are equivalent for the quantification of coronary artery calcifications. The extent of calcifications can be established with both modalities using either TCS or VCS score values.
引用
收藏
页码:1006 / 1011
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Noninvasive coronary angiography by contrast-enhanced electron beam computed tomography [J].
Achenbach, S ;
Moshage, W ;
Bachmann, K .
CLINICAL CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (05) :323-330
[2]  
AGATSTON A, 1992, ULTRAFAST COMPUTED T, pS77
[3]   QUANTIFICATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY CALCIUM USING ULTRAFAST COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
AGATSTON, AS ;
JANOWITZ, WR ;
HILDNER, FJ ;
ZUSMER, NR ;
VIAMONTE, M ;
DETRANO, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1990, 15 (04) :827-832
[4]   AN UPDATED CORONARY RISK PROFILE - A STATEMENT FOR HEALTH-PROFESSIONALS [J].
ANDERSON, KM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
ODELL, PM ;
KANNEL, WB .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :356-362
[5]  
BASKIN K, 1995, AM J CARD IMAGING, V9, pS10
[6]   Comparison of electron beam computed tomography with intracoronary ultrasound and coronary angiography for detection of coronary atherosclerosis [J].
Baumgart, D ;
Schmermund, A ;
Goerge, G ;
Haude, M ;
Ge, JB ;
Adamzik, M ;
Sehnert, C ;
Altmaier, K ;
Groenemeyer, D ;
Seibel, R ;
Erbel, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1997, 30 (01) :57-64
[7]  
BECKER C, 1998, ADV ULTRAFAST COMPUT
[8]  
BECKER C, 1998, IN PRESS EUR RADIOL
[9]   SMALL LESIONS IN THE HEART IDENTIFIED AT ELECTRON-BEAM CT - CALCIFICATION OR NOISE [J].
BIELAK, LF ;
KAUFMANN, RB ;
MOLL, PP ;
MCCOLLOUGH, CH ;
SCHWARTZ, RS ;
SHEEDY, PF .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 192 (03) :631-636
[10]   Coronary artery disease: Improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method [J].
Callister, TQ ;
Cooil, B ;
Raya, SP ;
Lippolis, NJ ;
Russo, DJ ;
Raggi, P .
RADIOLOGY, 1998, 208 (03) :807-814