The effect of antilymphocyte induction therapy on renal allograft survival - A meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

被引:105
作者
Szczech, LA
Berlin, JA
Feldman, HI
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] New York Med Coll, Westchester Cty Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Valhalla, NY 10595 USA
关键词
kidney transplantation; antilymphocyte serum; transplantation; homologous; graft survival; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-128-10-199805150-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Randomized, controlled trials have not shown that the perioperative use of antilymphocyte antibodies (induction therapy) improves survival of cadaveric kidney allografts. This study combined individual patient-level data from published trials to examine the effect of induction therapy on allograft survival. Data Sources: Randomized, controlled trials identified from MEDLINE. Study Selection: Published trials that compared adult recipients of cadaveric renal allografts who did and did not receive antilymphocyte antibodies in the perioperative period were selected if individual patient-level data were available. Data Extraction and Analysis: Individual patient-level data were collected for each of 628 study patients. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the effect of induction therapy on allograft survival. Results: The adjusted rate ratio for allograft failure with induction therapy compared with conventional therapy was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.90) (P = 0.012) over 2 years and 0.82 (CI, 0.62 to 1.09) (P = 0.17) over 5 years. The effect of induction therapy on allograft survival diminished over time; no benefit overall was seen after 2 years after transplantation (rate ratio, 1.13 [CI, 0.72 to 1.78]) (P > 0.2). Greater HLA-DR mismatch, delayed allograft function, diabetes mellitus in the recipient, African-American ethnicity of the recipient, and presensitization (panel-reactive antibody levels greater than or equal to 20%) were significantly associated with allograft failure at 5 years. Among high-risk patients, only those who were presensitized benefited from induction therapy at 2 years (rate ratio, 0.12 [CI, 0.03 to 0.44]) (P = 0.001). Results were similar at 5 years. Conclusions: Using individual-level data, this study showed a benefit of induction therapy at 2 years, particularly among presensitized patients. Although the benefit of this therapy subsequently waned, presensitized patients continued to have benefit at 5 years.
引用
收藏
页码:817 / +
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
[2]   THE LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF PROPHYLACTIC OKT3 MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY IN CADAVER KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION - A SINGLE-CENTER, PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED STUDY [J].
ABRAMOWICZ, D ;
GOLDMAN, M ;
DEPAUW, L ;
VANHERWEGHEM, JL ;
KINNAERT, P ;
VEREERSTRAETEN, P .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1992, 54 (03) :433-437
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Lancet, V339, P1
[4]  
BABCOCK SK, 1987, TRANSPLANT P, V19, P303
[5]  
BANHEGYI C, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P2207
[6]  
BELITSKY P, 1994, TRANSPLANT P, V26, P2485
[7]  
BELITSKY P, 1991, TRANSPLANT P, V23, P999
[8]   IMPROVED RESULTS USING OKT3 AS INDUCTION IMMUNOSUPPRESSION IN RENAL-ALLOGRAFT RECIPIENTS WITH DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION [J].
BENVENISTY, AI ;
COHEN, D ;
STEGALL, MD ;
HARDY, MA .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1990, 49 (02) :321-327
[9]  
CACCIARELLI T, 1993, CLIN NEPHROL, V39, P335
[10]  
CALNE RY, 1985, LANCET, V2, P549