HEpiMA:: software for the identification of heterogeneity in meta-analysis

被引:62
作者
Costa-Bouzas, J
Takkouche, B [1 ]
Cadarso-Suárez, C
Spiegelman, D
机构
[1] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Med, Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Santiago De Compostela 15705, Spain
[2] Univ A Coruna, Fac Informat, Dept Math, A Coruna, Spain
[3] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Santiago De Compostela 15705, Spain
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
meta-analysis; heterogeneity of effect measures; bootstrap; epidemiology;
D O I
10.1016/S0169-2607(00)00087-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Meta-analysis is a quantitative method available to epidemiologists, psychologists, social scientists and others who wish to produce a summary measure of the effect of exposure on disease, based on results from published studies along with a summary measure of uncertainty. The magnitude of the effect vary from study to study because of differences in the features of these studies (design, population, control of confounding variables etc.). From the various studies an estimator is formed by pooling the results found in each study in one summary measure. This summary (or pooled) measure is meaningful only if the magnitude of heterogeneity between study effects is small and can be explained by sampling variation. In this paper, we present HEpiMA, a new comprehensive and user-friendly software program for epidemiologic meta-analysis. HEpiMA has new features that are not available in other programs. The program cal I ies out a complete study of heterogeneity of study effects with 11 hypothesis test results. In addition to model-based methods, the program also implements bootstrap methodology. New useful estimators of heterogeneity, Ri and CV,, developed by the authors are given in the output. In addition to these unique features, the major advantage of this software is the option for direct entry of adjusted relative risk estimates of individual studies, the most common form of presentation of results in the epidemiologic literature. This program may also be useful for meta-analysts of clinical trials, in which the relative risk is the parameter of interest as it also allows the entry of elude data under the form of 2 x 2 tables. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MODERN EPIDEMIOLOGY
[2]   INVITED COMMENTARY - BENEFITS OF HETEROGENEITY IN METAANALYSIS OF DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES [J].
BERLIN, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (04) :383-387
[3]   HETEROGENEITY IN METAANALYSIS OF DATA FROM EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES - COMMENTARY [J].
COLDITZ, GA ;
BURDICK, E ;
MOSTELLER, F .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1995, 142 (04) :371-382
[4]   EasyMA: A program for the meta-analysis of clinical trials [J].
Cucherat, M ;
Boissel, JP ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Haugh, MC .
COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 1997, 53 (03) :187-190
[5]   METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
DERSIMONIAN, R ;
LAIRD, N .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03) :177-188
[6]  
*IMSL INC, 1991, IMSL VERS 2 0
[7]   Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse [J].
Lipsitz, SR ;
Dear, KBG ;
Laird, NM ;
Molenberghs, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1998, 54 (01) :148-160
[8]  
*NAT RES COUNC, 1992, COMB INF STAT ISS OP, P52
[9]  
NORMAND SLT, 1995, AM STAT, V49, P298, DOI 10.2307/2684205
[10]   METAANALYSIS SHMETA-ANALYSIS [J].
SHAPIRO, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 140 (09) :771-778