Production efficiency of loblolly pine and sweetgum in response to four years of intensive management

被引:77
作者
Samuelson, L [1 ]
Stokes, T
Cooksey, T
McLemore, P
机构
[1] Auburn Univ, Sch Forestry & Wildlife Sci, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
[2] Int Paper, Southlands Expt Forests, Bainbridge, GA 31717 USA
关键词
irrigation; fertilization; Liquidambar styraciflua; net photosynthesis; net primary production; Pinus taeda;
D O I
10.1093/treephys/21.6.369
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
We tested the hypothesis that productivity of intensively managed loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) and sweet-gum (Liquidambar styraciflua L.) stands is dependent not only on leaf area, but also on foliar photosynthetic rate. Effects of irrigation (irrigation treatment), irrigation with a fertilizer solution (fertigation treatment), and fertigation + pest control (loblolly pine only; fertigation + pest control treatment) on leaf physiology and growth were compared with control plots during the third and fourth growing seasons. Complete weed control was maintained on all plots. Aboveground net primary productivity of loblolly pine and sweetgum increased from 16.3 to 40.5 Mg ha(-1) and from 4.2 to 23.9 Mg ha(-1), respectively, in response to the most intensive treatment. Relative to the control treatment, neither fertigation of sweetgum nor fertigation + pest control of loblolly pine had a significant or consistent influence on foliar N concentration, quantum yield, carboxylation efficiency, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, or production efficiency (increment in woody biomass per unit leaf area). Irrigation increased predawn leaf water potential and photosynthesis of loblolly pine, but it had no effect on production efficiency. Leaf area was the predominant determinant of maximum productivity in these rapidly growing plantations.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 376
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Self-shading, carbon gain and leaf dynamics: a test of alternative optimality models [J].
Ackerly, D .
OECOLOGIA, 1999, 119 (03) :300-310
[2]  
Albaugh TJ, 1998, FOREST SCI, V44, P317
[3]  
Beets PN, 1996, TREE PHYSIOL, V16, P131
[4]  
COLBERT SR, 1990, FOREST SCI, V36, P995
[5]  
Draper N. R., 1966, APPL REGRESSION ANAL
[6]  
Ewers BE, 1999, ECOL APPL, V9, P513, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0513:COEOWA]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]   Changes in the canopy and growth of Pinus radiata in response to nitrogen supply [J].
Fife, DN ;
Nambiar, EKS .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 93 (1-2) :137-152
[9]   DYNAMICS OF CANOPY STRUCTURE AND LIGHT INTERCEPTION IN PINUS-ELLIOTTII STANDS, NORTH FLORIDA [J].
GHOLZ, HL ;
VOGEL, SA ;
CROPPER, WP ;
MCKELVEY, K ;
EWEL, KC ;
TESKEY, RO ;
CURRAN, PJ .
ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 1991, 61 (01) :33-51
[10]   WATER AND FOREST PRODUCTIVITY [J].
GHOLZ, HL ;
EWEL, KC ;
TESKEY, RO .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 30 (1-4) :1-18