The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: factor structure in a non-clinical sample

被引:129
作者
Kubarych, TS
Deary, IJ
Austin, EJ
机构
[1] New York State Psychiat Inst & Hosp, Unit 22, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Dept Psychol, Edinburgh EH8 9JZ, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
narcissism; power; exhibitionism; five-factor model; factor analysis; psychometrics;
D O I
10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00158-2
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Narcissistic Personality Inventory (NPI) is the most widely used measure of the construct of narcissism. Four- and seven-factor solutions have been reported for the instrument. In the present study, 338 undergraduates completed the NPI along with a battery of personality questionnaires that include the NEO-FFI. Exploratory principal components analysis indicated that the NPI had a two- or three-factor structure. Confirmatory factor analyses were undertaken for one-, two- and three-factor models of the instrument. Fit indices were poor, typical of models with many item-level variables. The fits can be improved by allowing plausible correlated error terms in instances where items have very similar content. As a whole, the NPI is measuring a general narcissism construct, with two or three separable, correlated factors relating to 'power', 'exhibitionism', and being a 'special person'. A psychometrically improved version of the NPI could be developed based on these factors. In the present study confirmatory factor analysis provided some insights not available from exploratory factor analysis, but was still largely exploratory in nature. NEO correlations with the overall factor were 0.36 for both extraversion and low agreeableness, with additional highly significant correlations for low neuroticism and high openness to experience. NEO correlations for the lower-order factors were similar. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:857 / 872
页数:16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], PERSONALITY DISORDER, DOI [10.1037/10140-003, DOI 10.1037/10140-003]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, GREEK MYTHS
[3]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual
[4]  
Bulfinch Thomas, 1959, MYTHOLOGY
[5]  
Carroll B J., 1993, Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytical studies
[6]   THE NATURE OF THE DATA, OR HOW TO CHOOSE A CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT [J].
CARROLL, JB .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1961, 26 (04) :347-372
[7]  
Costa P.T., 1992, PROFESSIONAL MANUAL
[8]   THE PERSONALITY DEVIANCE SCALES - THEIR DEVELOPMENT, ASSOCIATIONS, FACTOR STRUCTURE AND RESTRUCTURING [J].
DEARY, IJ ;
BEDFORD, A ;
FOWKES, FGR .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 1995, 19 (03) :275-291
[9]   The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are norms reliable than O and E [J].
Egan, V ;
Deary, I ;
Austin, E .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 29 (05) :907-920