Adhesion prevention in patients with multiple cesarean deliveries

被引:49
作者
Bates, Gordon Wright, Jr. [1 ]
Shomento, Stacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Birmingham, AL 35233 USA
关键词
adhesions; cesarean delivery; POSTOPERATIVE ADHESIONS; INTRAABDOMINAL ADHESIONS; SEPRAFILM; SURGERY; MULTICENTER; REDUCTION; BARRIER; SECTION; MYOMECTOMY; INTERCEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2011.09.030
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Adhesion formation is a well-known complication of abdominal surgery. Although one third of all deliveries in the United States are by cesarean delivery (CD), little is known about adhesions in the obstetric setting. Various surgical techniques for reducing adhesion formation following CD have been investigated. The relative benefits of peritoneal closure and single-layer uterine closure are areas of continued research and debate. Adhesion prevention products are also becoming more commonplace in gynecologic surgery. Two membrane/adhesion barriers have been approved in the United States. A barrier consisting of oxidized regenerated cellulose (Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier) has been shown to reduce adhesions during microsurgery. Its use may be limited following CD because complete hemostasis is crucial to its efficacy. Seprafilm adhesion barrier, composed of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethylcellulose, is approved for use in abdominal or pelvic laparotomy. Preliminary data suggest that it may be effective for reducing adhesions following CD. This article discusses what is currently known about adhesion prevention in the obstetric population and highlights the paucity of level I evidence available to clinicians in this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:S19 / S24
页数:6
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]
Statins (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors) decrease postoperative adhesions by increasing peritoneal fibrinolytic activity [J].
Aarons, Cary B. ;
Cohen, Philip A. ;
Gower, Adam ;
Reed, Karen L. ;
Leeman, Susan E. ;
Stucchi, Arthur F. ;
Becker, James M. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (02) :176-184
[2]
Adhesion prevention in gynecologic surgery [J].
Al-Jaroudi, D ;
Tulandi, T .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2004, 59 (05) :360-367
[3]
Postoperative adhesions: From formation to prevention [J].
Alpay, Zeynep ;
Saed, Ghassan M. ;
Diamond, Michael P. .
SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 26 (04) :313-321
[4]
Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery [J].
不详 .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 90 :S144-S149
[6]
[Anonymous], 1997, Interceed absorbable adhesion barrier [prescribing information]
[7]
[Anonymous], 2007, Seprafilm adhesion barrier [prescribing information]
[8]
An evaluation of low molecular weight heparin and hyperbaric oxygen treatment in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions and wound healing [J].
Arikan, S ;
Adas, G ;
Barut, G ;
Toklu, AS ;
Kocakusak, A ;
Uzun, H ;
Kemik, W ;
Daduk, Y ;
Aydin, S ;
Purisa, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2005, 189 (02) :155-160
[9]
A prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled study of the safety of Seprafilm® adhesion barrier in abdominopelvic surgery of the intestine [J].
Beck, DE ;
Cohen, Z ;
Fleshman, JW ;
Kaufman, HS ;
van Goor, H ;
Wolff, BG .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2003, 46 (10) :1310-1319
[10]
Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions [J].
Blumenfeld, Y. J. ;
Caughey, A. B. ;
El-Sayed, Y. Y. ;
Daniels, K. ;
Lyell, D. J. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2010, 117 (06) :690-694