A review and psychometric evaluation of pregnancy-specific stress measures

被引:156
作者
Alderdice, Fiona [1 ]
Lynn, Fiona [1 ]
Lobel, Marci [2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ Belfast, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Belfast BT9 5BN, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Psychol, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
关键词
Measurement; pregnancy; reliability; stress; validity; PRENATAL MATERNAL STRESS; CAMBRIDGE WORRY SCALE; INFANT BIRTH-WEIGHT; SPONTANEOUS PRETERM BIRTH; HIGH-RISK WOMEN; PERINATAL LOSS; PSYCHOSOCIAL PREDICTORS; EMOTIONAL DISTRESS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN; SOCIAL SUPPORT;
D O I
10.3109/0167482X.2012.673040
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Considerable evidence has accumulated on the association between pregnancy-specific stress and adverse birth outcomes with an increasing number of measures of pregnancy-specific stress being developed internationally. However, the introduction of these measures has not always been theoretically or psychometrically grounded, resulting in questions about the quality and direction of such research. This review summarizes evidence on the reliability and validity of pregnancy-specific stress measures identified between 1980 and October 2010. Fifteen pregnancy-specific stress measures were identified. Cronbach's alpha coefficient ranged from 0.51-0.96 and predictive validity data on preterm birth were reported for five measures. Convergent validity data suggest that pregnancy-specific stress is related to, but distinct from, global stress. Findings from this review consolidate current knowledge on pregnancy-specific stress as a consistent predictor of premature birth. This review also advances awareness of the range of measures of pregnancy-specific stress and documents their strengths and limitations based on published reliability and validity data. Careful consideration needs to be given as to which measures to use in future research to maximize the development of stress theory in pregnancy and appropriate interventions for women who experience stress in pregnancy. An international, strategic collaboration is recommended to advance knowledge in this area of study.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 77
页数:16
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]   Factor structure of the Prenatal Distress Questionnaire [J].
Alderdice, Fiona ;
Lynn, Fiona .
MIDWIFERY, 2011, 27 (04) :553-559
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Handbook of psychological testing
[3]  
[Anonymous], HDB HLTH PS IN PRESS
[4]  
Armstrong D, 1998, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs, V27, P183, DOI 10.1111/j.1552-6909.1998.tb02609.x
[5]   Impact of prior perinatal loss on subsequent pregnancies [J].
Armstrong, DS .
JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2004, 33 (06) :765-773
[6]   Emotional distress and prenatal attachment in pregnancy after perinatal loss [J].
Armstrong, DS .
JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2002, 34 (04) :339-345
[7]   ANXIETY, PREGNANCY, LABOR, AND NEONATE [J].
BURSTEIN, I ;
KINCH, RAH ;
STERN, L .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1974, 118 (02) :195-199
[8]   High pregnancy anxiety during mid-gestation is associated with decreased gray matter density in 6-9-year-old children [J].
Buss, Claudia ;
Davis, Elysia Poggi ;
Muftuler, L. Tugan ;
Head, Kevin ;
Sandman, Curt A. .
PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) :141-153
[9]   Sharpening the focus on acculturative change - ARSMA-II, stress, pregnancy anxiety, and infant birthweight in recently immigrated Latinas [J].
Campos, Belinda ;
Schetter, Christine Dunkel ;
Walsh, Julia A. ;
Schenker, Marc .
HISPANIC JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES, 2007, 29 (02) :209-224
[10]   Familialism, Social Support, and Stress: Positive Implications for Pregnant Latinas [J].
Campos, Belinda ;
Schetter, Christine Dunkel ;
Abdou, Cleopatra A. ;
Hobel, Calvin J. ;
Glynn, Laura M. ;
Sandman, Curt A. .
CULTURAL DIVERSITY & ETHNIC MINORITY PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 14 (02) :155-162