Supplementing quantitative risk assessments with a stage addressing the risk understanding of the decision maker

被引:25
作者
Aven, Terje [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
Quantitative risk analysis; Assumptions; Knowledge; Uncertainties; Decision maker; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2016.03.003
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A quantitative probabilistic risk assessment produces a conditional risk description given the knowledge of the analysts (formulated to a large extent through assumptions). However, important aspects of the risk may be concealed in the background knowledge of the analyst and the assumptions. This paper discusses this issue, the main purpose being to present a two-stage risk assessment approach where the second stage addresses the risk understanding of the decision maker. This second-stage is to a large extent qualitative. The approach is novel with its separation between the analysts' conditional risk descriptions using probability judgments, and the decision maker's risk understanding. The approach aims at improving the use of risk assessment in practical decision making by ensuring that the results of the risk assessments are properly interpreted and the key aspects of risk, uncertainty and knowledge are brought to attention for the decision makers. Examples are used to illustrate the approach. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 57
页数:7
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A survey of dynamic methodologies for probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants [J].
Aldemir, Tunc .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2013, 52 :113-124
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Risk governance
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society
[4]   How useful is quantitative risk assessment? [J].
Apostolakis, GE .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2004, 24 (03) :515-520
[5]  
Aven T, 2016, RISK UNCERTAIN ENG S
[6]   A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (06) :790-797
[7]   On the allegations that small risks are treated out of proportion to their importance [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 140 :116-121
[8]   The risk concept-historical and recent development trends [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2012, 99 :33-44
[9]   Risk assessment assumptions [J].
Beard, AN .
CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2004, 21 (01) :19-31
[10]  
Borgonovo E., 2015, EUR J OPER RES, P1