Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi

被引:177
作者
Yedla, S [1 ]
Shrestha, RM [1 ]
机构
[1] Asian Inst Technol, Sch Environm Resources & Dev, Energy Program, Pathum Thani 12120, Thailand
关键词
AHP; CNG vehicles; Delhi; qualitative and quantitative criteria; sustainable transportation;
D O I
10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00027-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The present study examines the impact of including various qualitative criteria for the selection of alternative transportation options in Delhi. Three alternative transport options viz. 4-stroke 2-wheelers, CNG cars and CNG buses are prioritized based on six different criteria-energy saving potential (energy), emission reduction potential (environment), cost of operation (cost), availability of technology (technology), adaptability of the option (adaptability) and barriers to implementation (barrier). Based on quantitative criteria 'energy', 'environment' and 'cost', CNG car showed more potential in contributing to environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi followed by 4-stroke 2-wheelers and CNG buses. Qualitative criteria viz. 'technology', 'adaptability' and 'barriers' in prioritization process resulted in higher priority for 4-stroke 2-wheelers followed by CNG bus and CNG car. Integrated quantitative and qualitative criteria gave a contrasting result as compared to that of the conventional quantitative approach and qualitative approach with highest priority for CNG bus followed by 4-stroke 2-wheelers and CNG car. This could explain the reasons for failure of many potential alternative urban transport options. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 729
页数:13
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   PROCEDURES FOR SYNTHESIZING RATIO JUDGEMENTS [J].
ACZEL, J ;
SAATY, TL .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 27 (01) :93-102
[2]  
*AIT BANGK IGIDR M, 2000, AN TECHN OPT MIT ENV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, ANAL HIERARCHY PROCE
[4]  
Brandon C, 1996, COST INACTION VALUIN
[5]  
*EXP CHOIC INC, 2000, QUICK SHORT GUID US
[6]  
*GOV IND MIN ENV F, 1999, CPCB PAR, V6
[7]   SUPPORTING INDIVIDUALS IN GROUP DECISION-MAKING [J].
KORHONEN, P ;
WALLENIUS, J .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1990, 28 (03) :313-329
[8]   AXIOMATIC FOUNDATION OF THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
SAATY, TL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (07) :841-855
[10]  
SAATY TL, 1999, STOCKHOLM ENV I