Effects of changes in vascular tone on the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output measurements within an up to 6-hour calibration-free period

被引:140
作者
Hamzaoui, Olfa [1 ]
Monnet, Xavier [1 ]
Richard, Christian [1 ]
Osman, David [1 ]
Chemla, Denis [2 ]
Teboul, Jean-Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 11, EA 4046, Assistance publ Hop Paris, Ctr Hosp Univ Bicetre,Serv Reanimat Med, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[2] Univ Paris 11, EA 4046, Assistance publ Hop Paris, Ctr Hosp Univ Bicetre,Serv Dexplorat Fonct, Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
关键词
pulse contour analysis; pulse contour algorithm; cardiac output; transpulmonary thermodilution; real-time cardiac output monitoring;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.OB013E318161FEC4
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine whether the agreement between pulse contour and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac index (CI) measurements is altered by changes in vascular tone within an up to 6-hr calibration-free period. Design: Observational study. Setting: Medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. Patients: Fifty-nine critically ill patients. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Data from 59 critically ill patients equipped with a PiCCO device were retrospectively analyzed. The database contained the transpulmonary thermodilution CI (CIT) value obtained at each time point the device was calibrated and the pulse contour CI (CIpc) value recorded immediately before this time point. Seven subsets of CI pairs were defined according to intervals of time elapsed from the previous calibration (within the first 30 mins, between 30 mins and 1 hr, and every hour up to 6 hrs). In the whole set of 400 CI pairs, CIpc correlated with CIT (r(2) = .68, p < .001). The bias +/- SD was 0.12 +/- 0.61 L/min/m(2), and the percentage error was 35%. Among the seven time-interval subsets, the percentage error was < 30% only in the two first ones (27% and 26%, respectively). When changes in systemic vascular resistance by > 15% occurred (129 times), CIpc correlated with CIT (r(2) = .64), the bias +/- SD was 0.12 +/- 0.62 L/min/m(2), and the percentage error was 36%. In the subset of CI pairs recorded within the 1-hr calibration-free period while vascular resistance changed by > 15% (n = 32), the bias +/- SD was 0.04 +/- 0.47 L/min/m(2) and the percentage error was 29%. Conclusions: Our study in critically ill patients suggests that the agreement between pulse contour cardiac output and transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output was not significantly influenced by changes in vascular tone. However, after a 1-hr calibration-free period, recalibration may be encouraged. Such a procedure provides helpful information drawn from other thermodilution-derived variables.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 440
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output [J].
Bein, B ;
Worthmann, F ;
Tonner, PH ;
Paris, A ;
Steinfath, M ;
Hedderich, J ;
Scholz, J .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2004, 18 (02) :185-189
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
Buhre G, 1999, J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN, V13, P437
[4]   Clinical evaluation of the FloTrac/Nigileo™ system and two established continuous cardiac output monitoring devices in patients undergoing cardiac surgery [J].
Button, D. ;
Weibel, L. ;
Reuthebuch, O. ;
Genoni, M. ;
Zollinger, A. ;
Hofer, C. K. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 99 (03) :329-336
[5]   Comparison of FloTrac™ cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements [J].
Cannesson, M. ;
Attof, Y. ;
Rosamel, P. ;
Joseph, P. ;
Bastien, O. ;
Lehot, J.-J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (10) :832-839
[6]   Methodologies for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement: are we as good as we think we are? [J].
Cecconi, Maurizio ;
Grounds, Michael ;
Rhodes, Andrew .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2007, 13 (03) :294-296
[7]   Estimation of left ventricular systolic function by single transpulmonary thermodilution [J].
Combes, A ;
Berneau, JB ;
Luyt, CE ;
Trouillet, JL .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2004, 30 (07) :1377-1383
[8]   A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques [J].
Critchley, LAH ;
Critchley, JAJH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 1999, 15 (02) :85-91
[9]   Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device [J].
de Waal, Eric E. C. ;
Kalkman, Cor J. ;
Rex, Steffen ;
Buhre, Wolfgang F. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (08) :1904-1909
[10]   Continuous and intermittent cardiac output measurement:: pulmonary artery catheter versus aortic transpulmonary technique [J].
Della Rocca, G ;
Costa, MG ;
Pompei, L ;
Coccia, C ;
Pietropaoli, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (03) :350-356