Retention of parallel-sided titanium posts cemented with six luting agents: An in vitro study

被引:47
作者
Duncan, JP [1 ]
Pameijer, CH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prosthodont, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70006-X
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose. This in vitro study compared the effectiveness of 6 luting systems on the retention of prefabricated titanium posts. Material and methods. A total of 120 single-rooted teeth were sectioned at the cementoenamel junction and treated endodontically. Roots were mounted in copper cylinders, and prefabricated, parallel-sided titanium posts were cemented according to the manufacturer's instructions. Two resin-ionomer hybrid cements and 2 resin cements were tested with corresponding dentin bonding agents. A glass ionomer cement was also tested, and zinc-phosphate cement served as the control. Samples were tested in an Instron universal testing machine to catastrophic tensile failure. Results. Advance cement with Prime and Bond systems was found to be statistically more retentive than all other groups tested (P < .05). Cement It with Bond It and Permalute with Permalute Primers A and B systems demonstrated significantly greater retention than Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system and zinc-phosphate cement (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference among Ketac Cem cement, Resinomer with One-Step system, and zinc-phosphate cement.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   RETENTION OF DOWELS USING A COMPOSITE RESIN AS A CEMENTING MEDIUM [J].
ASSIF, D ;
FERBER, A .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1982, 48 (03) :292-296
[2]   RESTORATIVE AND ENDODONTIC RESULTS AFTER TREATMENT WITH CAST POSTS AND CORES [J].
BERGMAN, B ;
LUNDQUIST, P ;
SJOGREN, U ;
SUNDQUIST, G .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 61 (01) :10-15
[3]   RETENTION OF PREFABRICATED POSTS BY CEMENTS AND RESINS [J].
CHAPMAN, KW ;
WORLEY, JL ;
VONFRAUNHOFER, JA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1985, 54 (05) :649-652
[4]  
ELMOWAFY OM, 1994, OPER DENT, V19, P176
[5]  
Goodacre C J, 1994, J Prosthodont, V3, P243, DOI 10.1111/j.1532-849X.1994.tb00162.x
[6]   CEMENTING MEDIA AND RETENTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF DOWELS [J].
HANSON, EC ;
CAPUTO, AA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1974, 32 (05) :551-557
[7]   A 3-YEAR POSTOPERATIVE CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF POSTS AND CORES BENEATH EXISTING CROWNS [J].
HATZIKYRIAKOS, AH ;
REISIS, GI ;
TSINGOS, N .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 67 (04) :454-458
[8]   DOWEL FORM AND TENSILE FORCE [J].
JOHNSON, JK ;
SAKUMURA, JS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1978, 40 (06) :645-649
[9]   DOWEL RETENTION WITH GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT [J].
KRUPP, JD ;
CAPUTO, AA ;
TRABERT, KC ;
STANDLEE, JP .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1979, 41 (02) :163-166
[10]   FACTORS INFLUENCING RETENTION OF DOWELS [J].
KURER, HG ;
COMBE, EC ;
GRANT, AA .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1977, 38 (05) :515-525