The political feasibility of privatizing old-age insurance

被引:2
作者
Hirte, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, D-8027 Dresden, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9485.5004008
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Though a transition to a fully funded pension system is favoured by many economists, it is not even considered by politicians in Germany. This paper examines the hypothesis that this is in accordance with the preferences of the populalion. By performing a dynamic CGE analysis referenda on pension policies are simulated. They shall, that a fully, privatizing scheme is not politically feasible in Germany, however long the pre-announcement period, if the alternatives are the current policy or a partially privatizing policy. This explains why a fully privatizing policy is not an issue in the political debate in Germany. In order to examine what are the reasons for this outcome, the German Bismarckian System is compared to a Beveridge-System which is similar to the British pension system. Actually, in the latter case, a transition to a fully, funded system is what the majority opts for in a dynamically consistent equilibrium. This is evidence that the future of the pension system depends on its history.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 525
页数:19
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J POLITICAL
[2]  
[Anonymous], REDESIGNING SOCIAL S
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1996, TAX POLICY EC, DOI [DOI 10.1086/tpe.10.20061835, DOI 10.1086/TPE.10.20061835]
[4]  
Auerbach A., 1987, DYNAMIC FISCAL POLIC
[5]  
BELAN P, 1996, 9657 CORE U CATH LOU
[6]  
*BIS, 1998, MACR FIN IMPL AG POP
[7]  
Boadway R, 1991, J Popul Econ, V4, P257, DOI 10.1007/BF02426371
[8]  
Borsch-Supan A., 1998, REDESIGNING SOCIAL S, P129
[9]  
BORSCHSUPAN A, 1998, FINANZARCHIV, V55, P401
[10]  
BREYER F, 1989, J INST THEOR ECON, V145, P643