Motility and chemotaxis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens surface attachment and Biofilm formation

被引:147
作者
Merritt, Peter M. [1 ]
Danhorn, Thomas [1 ]
Fuqua, Clay [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1128/JB.00566-07
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Bacterial motility mechanisms, including swimming, swarming, and twitching, are known to have important roles in biofilm formation, including colonization and the subsequent expansion into mature structured surface communities. Directed motility requires chemotaxis functions that are conserved among many bacterial species. The biofilm-forming plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens drives swimming motility by utilizing a small group of flagella localized to a single pole or the subpolar region of the cell. There is no evidence for twitching or swarming motility in A. tumefaciens. Site-specific deletion mutations that resulted in either aflagellate, flagellated but nonmotile, or flagellated but nonchemotactic A. tumefaciens derivatives were examined for biofilm formation under static and flowing conditions. Nonmotile mutants were significantly deficient in biofilm formation under static conditions. Under flowing conditions, however, the aflagellate mutant rapidly formed aberrantly dense, tall biofilms. In contrast, a nonmotile mutant with unpowered flagella was clearly debilitated for biofilm formation relative to the wild type. A nontumbling chemotaxis mutant was only weakly affected with regard to biofilm formation under nonflowing conditions but was notably compromised in flow, generating less adherent biomass than the wild type, with a more dispersed cellular arrangement. Extragenic suppressor mutants of the chemotaxis-impaired, straight-swimming phenotype were readily isolated from motility agar plates. These mutants regained tumbling at a frequency similar to that of the wild type. Despite this phenotype, biofilm formation by the suppressor mutants in static cultures was significantly deficient. Under flowing conditions, a representative suppressor mutant manifested a phenotype similar to yet distinct from that of its nonchemotactic parent.
引用
收藏
页码:8005 / 8014
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   CHEMOTAXIS IN BACTERIA [J].
ADLER, J .
SCIENCE, 1966, 153 (3737) :708-&
[2]   Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures [J].
An, DD ;
Danhorn, T ;
Fuqua, C ;
Parsek, MR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2006, 103 (10) :3828-3833
[3]   Bacterial chemotaxis:: Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Sinorhizobium meliloti -: variations on a theme? [J].
Armitage, JP ;
Schmitt, R .
MICROBIOLOGY-UK, 1997, 143 :3671-3682
[4]   The rotary motor of bacterial flagella [J].
Berg, HC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 2003, 72 :19-54
[5]   POPULATIONS OF AGROBACTERIUM IN VINEYARD AND NON-VINEYARD SOILS AND GRAPE ROOTS IN VINEYARDS AND NURSERIES [J].
BURR, TJ ;
KATZ, BH ;
BISHOP, AL .
PLANT DISEASE, 1987, 71 (07) :617-620
[6]   Characterization of flagella genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and the effect of a bald strain on virulence [J].
Chesnokova, O ;
Coutinho, JB ;
Khan, IH ;
Mikhail, MS ;
Kado, CI .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 23 (03) :579-590
[7]  
Christensen BB, 1999, METHOD ENZYMOL, V310, P20
[8]   Type IV secretion: intercellular transfer of macromolecules by systems ancestrally related to conjugation machines [J].
Christie, PJ .
MOLECULAR MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 40 (02) :294-305
[9]   FACS-optimized mutants of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) [J].
Cormack, BP ;
Valdivia, RH ;
Falkow, S .
GENE, 1996, 173 (01) :33-38
[10]   Phosphorus limitation enhances biofilm formation of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens through the PhoR-PhoB regulatory system [J].
Danhorn, T ;
Hentzer, M ;
Givskov, M ;
Parsek, MR ;
Fuqua, C .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 2004, 186 (14) :4492-4501