Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer

被引:141
作者
Shimofusa, R
Fujimoto, H
Akamata, H
Motoori, K
Yamamoto, S
Ueda, T
Ito, H
机构
[1] Chiba Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chuo Ku, Chiba 2608677, Japan
[2] Numazu City Hosp, Dept Radiol, Shizuoka, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; prostate cancer; diffusion-weighted imaging; parallel imaging;
D O I
10.1097/01.rct.0000156396.13522.f2
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess whether T2-weighted (T2W) imaging with diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging could improve prostate cancer detection as compared with T2W imaging alone. Methods: The subjects consisted of 37 patients with prostate cancer and 23 without cancer undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Using a 1.5-T superconducting magnet, all patients underwent T2W and DW imaging with parallel imaging. Images were independently reviewed by 3 readers to determine the detectability of prostate cancer. The detectability of T2W imaging without and with DW imaging was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results: Mean areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for T2W imaging alone and for T2W imaging with DW imaging were 0.87 and 0.93, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the addition of DW imaging to conventional T2W imaging significantly improved tumor detection (P = 0.0468) compared with T2W imaging alone. Conclusions: The addition of DW imaging to conventional T2W imaging provides better detection of prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Improved diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) [J].
Bammer, R ;
Keeling, SL ;
Augustin, M ;
Pruessmann, KP ;
Wolf, R ;
Stollberger, R ;
Hartung, HP ;
Fazekas, F .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (03) :548-554
[2]   Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diflusion-weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate [J].
Gibbs, P ;
Tozer, DJ ;
Liney, GP ;
Turnbull, LW .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2001, 46 (06) :1054-1058
[3]   CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE-GLAND - MR-IMAGING WITH PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS VERSUS INTEGRATED ENDORECTAL PELVIC PHASED-ARRAY COILS [J].
HRICAK, H ;
WHITE, S ;
VIGNERON, D ;
KURHANEWICZ, J ;
KOSCO, A ;
LEVIN, D ;
WEISS, J ;
NARAYAN, P ;
CARROLL, PR .
RADIOLOGY, 1994, 193 (03) :703-709
[4]   Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: Detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions [J].
Ichikawa, T ;
Haradome, H ;
Hachiya, J ;
Nitatori, T ;
Araki, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 170 (02) :397-402
[5]   Prostatic MR imaging - Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders [J].
Ikonen, S ;
Kivisaari, L ;
Tervahartiala, P ;
Vehmas, T ;
Taari, K ;
Rannikko, S .
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2001, 42 (04) :348-354
[6]   In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging [J].
Issa, B .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2002, 16 (02) :196-200
[7]   Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: Correlation with histopathologic results [J].
Jager, GJ ;
Ruijter, ETG ;
vanderKaa, CA ;
delaRosette, JJMCH ;
Oosterhof, GON ;
Thornbury, JR ;
Ruijs, SHJ ;
Barentsz, JO .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 203 (03) :645-652
[8]   Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: Is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? [J].
Katayama, M ;
Masui, T ;
Kobayashi, S ;
Ito, T ;
Sakahara, H ;
Nozaki, A ;
Kabasawa, H .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2002, 26 (02) :250-256
[9]   Three-dimensional H-1 MR spectroscopic imaging of the in situ human prostate with high (0.24-0.1-cm(3)) spatial resolution [J].
Kurhanewicz, J ;
Vigneron, DB ;
Hricak, H ;
Narayan, P ;
Carroll, P ;
Nelson, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 198 (03) :795-805
[10]   MR IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF NONCANCEROUS LESIONS OF THE PROSTATE [J].
LOVETT, K ;
RIFKIN, MD ;
MCCUE, PA ;
CHOI, H .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1992, 2 (01) :35-39