Development of an ultrasonic technique for in situ investigating the properties of deposited protein during crossflow ultrafiltration

被引:38
作者
Li, JX
Sanderson, RD
Chai, GY
Hallbauer, DK
机构
[1] Tianjin Polytech Univ, Sch Mat Sci & Chem Engn, Tianjin 300160, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Polytech Univ, Key Lab Hollow Fiber Membrane Mat & Proc, Tianjin 300160, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Polytech Univ, Minist Educ, Tianjin 300160, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Stellenbosch, UNESCO Associated Ctr Macromol & Mat, Dept Chem, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
关键词
ultrasonic technique; bovine serum albumin; protein deposition; ultrafiltration; fouling; isoelectric point;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcis.2004.09.072
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Although an amount of research has reported that a flux minimum occurrs at the isoionic/isoelectric points (pH 4.6-5.0) in the absence of salts in the ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin (BSA), the real mechanism remains incompletely understood due to the lack of additional techniques in real time to detect the properties of deposited BSA (gel) layers formed during ultrafiltration (UF). An ultrasonic technique was developed as an analytical noninvasive tool to in situ investigate the properties of deposited BSA layers at pH 4.9 (isoionic or isoelectric point, IEP) and 6.9 during crossflow ultrafiltration. The membrane was a polysulfone (PSf) UF membrane with molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) 35 kDa. The feed used was 0.5 g/l BSA solution. Results show good correspondence between the ultrasonic signal responses and the development of BSA gel layers on the membranes. The deposit is thicker at pH 6.9 than at pH 4.9. However, the deposited gel layers are more compressible at pH 4.9 than at pH 6.9. The flux decline is mainly controlled by the density (packing) of the deposit layer. At pH 6.9, protein mainly deposits on the membrane surface. Around the isoelectric point, protein absorbs within and on the membranes. A functional relationship between acoustic signals and fouling resistance exists. The fouling resistance is mainly attributed to pore blocking or pore constriction. (c) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 238
页数:11
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   CHARACTERIZATION OF ULTRAFILTRATION POLYMERIC MEMBRANES [J].
ABATICCHIO, P ;
BOTTINO, A ;
RODA, GC ;
CAPANNELLI, G ;
MUNARI, S .
DESALINATION, 1990, 78 (02) :235-255
[2]   MASS-TRANSFER LIMITATIONS DURING ULTRAFILTRATION OF CHEESE WHEY WITH INORGANIC MEMBRANES [J].
AIMAR, P ;
TADDEI, C ;
LAFAILLE, JP ;
SANCHEZ, V .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1988, 38 (03) :203-221
[3]   ARTIFICIAL PARTICULATE FOULING OF HYPER-FILTRATION MEMBRANES .2. ANALYSIS AND PROTECTION FROM FOULING [J].
BELFORT, G ;
MARX, B .
DESALINATION, 1979, 28 (01) :13-30
[4]   THE BEHAVIOR OF SUSPENSIONS AND MACROMOLECULAR SOLUTIONS IN CROSS-FLOW MICROFILTRATION [J].
BELFORT, G ;
DAVIS, RH ;
ZYDNEY, AL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1994, 96 (1-2) :1-58
[5]   PROTEIN PRECIPITATE RECOVERY USING MICROPOROUS MEMBRANES [J].
BENTHAM, AC ;
IRETON, MJ ;
HOARE, M ;
DUNNILL, P .
BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING, 1988, 31 (09) :984-994
[6]  
Birks A. S., 1991, NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTI, V7
[7]  
BOND LJ, 2000, Patent No. 6161435
[8]  
Cheryan M., 1998, Ultrafiltration and microfiltration handbook
[9]  
CHERYAN M, 1980, ULTRAFILTRATION MEMB
[10]   THE EFFECT OF PH AND IONIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE ULTRAFILTRATION OF PROTEIN SOLUTIONS WITH RETENTIVE MEMBRANES [J].
FANE, AG ;
FELL, CJD ;
SUKI, A .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 1983, 16 (DEC) :195-210