Effect of ozone and open air factor against aerosolized Micrococcus luteus

被引:14
作者
Bailey, Roger
Fielding, Louise
Young, Andy
Griffith, Chris
机构
[1] Univ Wales Coll Cardiff, Inst Cardiff, Cardiff Sch Hlth Sci, Food Res & Consultancy Unit, Cardiff CF5 2YB, S Glam, Wales
[2] Ozone Ind Ltd, Unit B2, Southwood Summit Ctr, Farnborough GU14 ONR, Hants, England
关键词
D O I
10.4315/0362-028X-70.12.2769
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Because of increased concerns over failures in cleaning, the role of bioaerosols, and the environmental and clinical persistence of pathogens, the evaluation of novel decontaminants is increasingly important. The bactericidal properties of open air factor (OAF; a collection of highly reactive chemical species) were identified in the 1970s; however, the potential practical applications of artificially generated OAF have been considered only recently. In this study, the effects of OAF against Micrococcus luteus were investigated. OAF was generated and distributed in a bioaerosol test chamber by delivery of monoterpenes into ozonated air (0.1 ppm) at concentrations of 2.0 (high), 0.75 (medium), or 0.3 (low) mgm(-3) h(-1). M. luteus was aerosolized, and the number of culturable survivors was determined after 2, 5, 10, 20, and 60 min. Culturable bacteria were enumerated by aerobic plate counts in all-glass impinger fluid. Data were analyzed for statistical significance using one- or two-way analyses of variance. When aerosolized bacteria were exposed to ozone alone (0.05, 0.1, and 2 ppm), a significant (up to 3-log) reduction was observed at all concentrations, and the effect was time dependent. When exposed to the cyclic monoterpene alone, there were no significant differences between test samples and controls. When exposed to OAF (high and medium concentrations in 0.1 ppm ozone) there were significant differences after 20 min. These reductions were significantly greater than those achieved with ozone alone at 0.1 ppm. OAF is potentially an effective antibacterial agent that can reduce the microbial load in air. Because the technology uses reaction compounds naturally found in the environment, risks to health may be lower than those associated with ozone or other gaseous treatments. However, this hypothesis needs further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2769 / 2773
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
BAILEY RA, 2002, 89 ANN M INT ASS FOO
[2]   Fogging for the disinfection of food processing factories and equipment [J].
Burfoot, D ;
Hall, K ;
Brown, K ;
Xu, Y .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 10 (6-7) :205-210
[3]  
*CHIPP CAMPD CHORL, 2002, 163 CHIPP CAMPD CHOR
[4]  
*CHIPP CAMPD CHORL, 1997, 15 CHIPP CAMPD CHORL, P45
[5]   Disinfection of water containing natural organic matter by using ozone-initiated radical reactions [J].
Cho, M ;
Chung, HM ;
Yoon, J .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 69 (04) :2284-2291
[6]   BREAKS INDUCED IN DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC-ACID OF AEROSOLIZED ESCHERICHIA-COLI BY OZONIZED CYCLOHEXENE [J].
DEMIK, G ;
DEGROOT, I .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1978, 35 (01) :6-10
[7]  
DRUETT H, 1969, New Scientist, V41, P579
[8]   UNSTABLE GERMICIDAL POLLUTANT IN RURAL AIR [J].
DRUETT, HA ;
MAY, KR .
NATURE, 1968, 220 (5165) :395-&
[9]  
GURLEY B, 1985, Journal of Parenteral Science and Technology, V39, P256
[10]   SOME FACTORS AFFECTING THE AIRBORNE SURVIVAL OF BACTERIA OUTDOORS [J].
HANDLEY, BA ;
WEBSTER, AJF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1995, 79 (04) :368-378